» Articles » PMID: 22707566

Physical Confinement Alters Tumor Cell Adhesion and Migration Phenotypes

Overview
Journal FASEB J
Specialties Biology
Physiology
Date 2012 Jun 19
PMID 22707566
Citations 155
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cell migration on planar surfaces is driven by cycles of actin protrusion, integrin-mediated adhesion, and myosin-mediated contraction; however, this mechanism may not accurately describe movement in 3-dimensional (3D) space. By subjecting cells to restrictive 3D environments, we demonstrate that physical confinement constitutes a biophysical stimulus that alters cell morphology and suppresses mesenchymal motility in human breast carcinoma (MDA-MB-231). Dorsoventral polarity, stress fibers, and focal adhesions are markedly attenuated by confinement. Inhibitors of myosin, Rho/ROCK, or β1-integrins do not impair migration through 3-μm-wide channels (confinement), even though these treatments repress motility in 50-μm-wide channels (unconfined migration) by ≥50%. Strikingly, confined migration persists even when F-actin is disrupted, but depends largely on microtubule (MT) dynamics. Interfering with MT polymerization/depolymerization causes confined cells to undergo frequent directional changes, thereby reducing the average net displacement by ≥80% relative to vehicle controls. Live-cell EB1-GFP imaging reveals that confinement redirects MT polymerization toward the leading edge, where MTs continuously impact during advancement of the cell front. These results demonstrate that physical confinement can induce cytoskeletal alterations that reduce the dependence of migrating cells on adhesion-contraction force coupling. This mechanism may explain why integrins can exhibit reduced or altered function during migration in 3D environments.

Citing Articles

Direct current electrical fields inhibit cancer cell motility in microchannel confinements.

Naggay B, Farahani S, Gao X, Holle A, Kemkemer R Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4605.

PMID: 39920207 PMC: 11806051. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87737-7.


Gradients in cell density and shape transitions drive collective cell migration into confining environments.

Lin W, Yu H, Pathak A Soft Matter. 2025; 21(4):719-728.

PMID: 39784299 PMC: 11715644. DOI: 10.1039/d3sm01240a.


Force-transducing molecular ensembles at growing microtubule tips control mitotic spindle size.

Chu L, Stedman D, Gannon J, Cox S, Pobegalov G, Molodtsov M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9865.

PMID: 39543105 PMC: 11564643. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54123-2.


Compressive stresses in cancer: characterization and implications for tumour progression and treatment.

Linke J, Munn L, Jain R Nat Rev Cancer. 2024; 24(11):768-791.

PMID: 39390249 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-024-00745-z.


Effects of Confined Microenvironments with Protein Coating, Nanotopography, and TGF-β Inhibitor on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cell Migration through Channels.

Hong X, Xu Y, Pang S J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(9).

PMID: 39330238 PMC: 11433299. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15090263.


References
1.
Wozniak M, Desai R, Solski P, Der C, Keely P . ROCK-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix. J Cell Biol. 2003; 163(3):583-95. PMC: 2173660. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200305010. View

2.
Jaalouk D, Lammerding J . Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009; 10(1):63-73. PMC: 2668954. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2597. View

3.
Irimia D, Toner M . Spontaneous migration of cancer cells under conditions of mechanical confinement. Integr Biol (Camb). 2009; 1(8-9):506-12. PMC: 3763902. DOI: 10.1039/b908595e. View

4.
Renkawitz J, Schumann K, Weber M, Lammermann T, Pflicke H, Piel M . Adaptive force transmission in amoeboid cell migration. Nat Cell Biol. 2009; 11(12):1438-43. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1992. View

5.
Gardel M, Schneider I, Aratyn-Schaus Y, Waterman C . Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009; 26:315-33. PMC: 4437624. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.011209.122036. View