» Articles » PMID: 22704222

In Vivo Chronic Myocardial Infarction Characterization by Spin Locked Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Abstract

Background: Late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is frequently used to evaluate myocardial viability, estimate total infarct size and transmurality, but is not always straightforward is and contraindicated in patients with renal failure because of the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. T2- and T1-weighted CMR alone is however relatively insensitive to chronic myocardial infarction (MI) in the absence of a contrast agent. The objective of this manuscript is to explore T1ρ-weighted rotating frame CMR techniques for infarct characterization without contrast agents. We hypothesize that T1ρ CMR accurately measures infarct size in chronic MI on account of a large change in T1ρ relaxation time between scar and myocardium.

Methods: 7Yorkshire swine underwent CMR at 8 weeks post-surgical induction of apical or posterolateral myocardial infarction. Late gadolinium enhanced and T1ρ CMR were performed at high resolution to visualize MI. T1ρ-weighted imaging was performed with a B₁  = 500 Hz spin lock pulse on a 3 T clinical MR scanner. Following sacrifice, the heart was excised and infarct size was calculated by optical planimetry. Infarct size was calculated for all three methods (LGE, T1ρ and planimetry) and statistical analysis was performed. T1ρ relaxation time maps were computed from multiple T1ρ-weighted images at varying spin lock duration.

Results: Mean infarct contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in LGE and T1ρ CMR was 2.8 ± 0.1 and 2.7 ± 0.1. The variation in signal intensity of tissues was found to be, in order of decreasing signal intensity, LV blood, fat and edema, infarct and healthy myocardium. Infarct size measured by T1ρ CMR (21.1% ± 1.4%) was not significantly different from LGE CMR (22.2% ± 1.5%) or planimetry (21.1% ± 2.7%; p < 0.05).T1ρ relaxation times were T1ρinfarct = 91.7 ms in the infarct and T1ρremote = 47.2 ms in the remote myocardium.

Conclusions: T1ρ-weighted imaging using long spin locking pulses enables high discrimination between infarct and myocardium. T1ρ CMR may be useful to visualizing MI without the need for exogenous contrast agents for a wide range of clinical cardiac applications such as to distinguish edema and scar tissue and tissue characterization of myocarditis and ventricular fibrosis.

Citing Articles

Feasibility of relaxation along a fictitious field in the 2nd rotating frame (T) mapping in the human myocardium at 3 T.

Tourais J, Bozic-Iven M, Zhao Y, Tao Q, Pierce I, Nitsche C Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1373240.

PMID: 39697300 PMC: 11652659. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1373240.


Enabling Reliable Visual Detection of Chronic Myocardial Infarction with Native T1 Cardiac MRI Using Data-Driven Native Contrast Mapping.

Youssef K, Zhang X, Yoosefian G, Chen Y, Chan S, Yang H Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024; 6(4):e230338.

PMID: 39023374 PMC: 11369652. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.230338.


Advanced Myocardial MRI Tissue Characterization Combining Contrast Agent-Free T1-Rho Mapping With Fully Automated Analysis.

de Villedon de Naide V, Narceau K, Ozenne V, Villegas-Martinez M, Nogues V, Brillet N J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024; 61(3):1353-1365.

PMID: 38949101 PMC: 11803686. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29502.


Cardiac MR Fingerprinting: Overview, Technical Developments, and Applications.

Rashid I, Cruz G, Seiberlich N, Hamilton J J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023; 60(5):1753-1773.

PMID: 38153855 PMC: 11211246. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29206.


Assessment of myocardial injuries in ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies using magnetic resonance T1-rho mapping.

Bustin A, Pineau X, Sridi S, van Heeswijk R, Jais P, Stuber M Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023; 25(4):548-557.

PMID: 37987558 PMC: 10966324. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jead319.


References
1.
Sutton M, Sharpe N . Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: pathophysiology and therapy. Circulation. 2000; 101(25):2981-8. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.25.2981. View

2.
Miller S, Helber U, Kramer U, Hahn U, Carr J, Stauder N . Subacute myocardial infarction: assessment by STIR T2-weighted MR imaging in comparison to regional function. MAGMA. 2001; 13(1):8-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF02668645. View

3.
Muthupillai R, Flamm S, Wilson J, Pettigrew R, Dixon W . Acute myocardial infarction: tissue characterization with T1rho-weighted MR imaging--initial experience. Radiology. 2004; 232(2):606-10. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2322030334. View

4.
Strijkers G, Bouts A, Blankesteijn W, Peeters T, Vilanova A, van Prooijen M . Diffusion tensor imaging of left ventricular remodeling in response to myocardial infarction in the mouse. NMR Biomed. 2008; 22(2):182-90. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1299. View

5.
Balaban R, Chesnick S, Hedges K, Samaha F, Heineman F . Magnetization transfer contrast in MR imaging of the heart. Radiology. 1991; 180(3):671-5. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.180.3.1871277. View