» Articles » PMID: 37987558

Assessment of Myocardial Injuries in Ischaemic and Non-ischaemic Cardiomyopathies Using Magnetic Resonance T1-rho Mapping

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: To identify clinical correlates of myocardial T1ρ and to examine how myocardial T1ρ values change under various clinical scenarios.

Methods And Results: A total of 66 patients (26% female, median age 57 years [Q1-Q3, 44-65 years]) with known structural heart disease and 44 controls (50% female, median age 47 years [28-57 years]) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T, including T1ρ mapping, T2 mapping, native T1 mapping, late gadolinium enhancement, and extracellular volume (ECV) imaging. In controls, T1ρ positively related with T2 (P = 0.038) and increased from basal to apical levels (P < 0.001). As compared with controls and remote myocardium, T1ρ significantly increased in all patients' sub-groups and all types of myocardial injuries: acute and chronic injuries, focal and diffuse tissue abnormalities, as well as ischaemic and non-ischaemic aetiologies (P < 0.05). T1ρ was independently associated with T2 in patients with acute injuries (P = 0.004) and with native T1 and ECV in patients with chronic injuries (P < 0.05). Myocardial T1ρ mapping demonstrated good intra- and inter-observer reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.86 and 0.83, respectively).

Conclusion: Myocardial T1ρ mapping appears to be reproducible and equally sensitive to acute and chronic myocardial injuries, whether of ischaemic or non-ischaemic origins. It may thus be a contrast-agent-free biomarker for gaining new and quantitative insight into myocardial structural disorders. These findings highlight the need for further studies through prospective and randomized trials.

Citing Articles

[Clincial Research Progress in Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy].

Shi K, Yu S, Xia D, Guo Y, Yang Z Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025; 55(6):1357-1363.

PMID: 39990836 PMC: 11839347. DOI: 10.12182/20241160601.

References
1.
Almogheer B, Antonopoulos A, Azzu A, Al Mohdar S, Vlachopoulos C, Pantazis A . Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Neuromuscular Cardiomyopathies. Pediatr Cardiol. 2021; 43(1):27-38. DOI: 10.1007/s00246-021-02686-y. View

2.
Kim R, Fieno D, Parrish T, Harris K, Chen E, Simonetti O . Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation. 1999; 100(19):1992-2002. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.100.19.1992. View

3.
Roy C, Slimani A, de Meester C, Amzulescu M, Pasquet A, Vancraeynest D . Age and sex corrected normal reference values of T1, T2 T2* and ECV in healthy subjects at 3T CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017; 19(1):72. PMC: 5609021. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0371-5. View

4.
Han Y, Liimatainen T, Gorman R, Witschey W . Assessing Myocardial Disease Using T MRI. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2014; 7(2):9248. PMC: 3968806. DOI: 10.1007/s12410-013-9248-7. View

5.
van Oorschot J, El Aidi H, Jansen Of Lorkeers S, Gho J, Froeling M, Visser F . Endogenous assessment of chronic myocardial infarction with T(1ρ)-mapping in patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014; 16:104. PMC: 4272542. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-014-0104-y. View