» Articles » PMID: 22487047

Surprise! Neural Correlates of Pearce-Hall and Rescorla-Wagner Coexist Within the Brain

Overview
Journal Eur J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 Apr 11
PMID 22487047
Citations 83
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Learning theory and computational accounts suggest that learning depends on errors in outcome prediction as well as changes in processing of or attention to events. These divergent ideas are captured by models, such as Rescorla-Wagner (RW) and temporal difference (TD) learning on the one hand, which emphasize errors as directly driving changes in associative strength, vs. models such as Pearce-Hall (PH) and more recent variants on the other hand, which propose that errors promote changes in associative strength by modulating attention and processing of events. Numerous studies have shown that phasic firing of midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons carries a signed error signal consistent with RW or TD learning theories, and recently we have shown that this signal can be dissociated from attentional correlates in the basolateral amygdala and anterior cingulate. Here we will review these data along with new evidence: (i) implicating habenula and striatal regions in supporting error signaling in midbrain DA neurons; and (ii) suggesting that the central nucleus of the amygdala and prefrontal regions process the amygdalar attentional signal. However, while the neural instantiations of the RW and PH signals are dissociable and complementary, they may be linked. Any linkage would have implications for understanding why one signal dominates learning in some situations and not others, and also for appreciating the potential impact on learning of neuropathological conditions involving altered DA or amygdalar function, such as schizophrenia, addiction or anxiety disorders.

Citing Articles

Interpretation of individual differences in computational neuroscience using a latent input approach.

Schaaf J, Miletic S, van Duijvenvoorde A, Huizenga H Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025; 72:101512.

PMID: 39854872 PMC: 11804603. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101512.


SNARC effect in a transfer paradigm: long-lasting effects of stimulus-response compatibility practices.

Bulut M, Cetinkaya H, Dural S Psychol Res. 2025; 89(1):47.

PMID: 39825926 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-02057-1.


Pavlovian safety learning: An integrative theoretical review.

Laing P, Vervliet B, Dunsmoor J, Harrison B Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 32(1):176-202.

PMID: 39167292 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02559-4.


Neurons of Macaque Frontal Eye Field Signal Reward-Related Surprise.

Shteyn M, Olson C J Neurosci. 2024; 44(38).

PMID: 39107059 PMC: 11411596. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0441-24.2024.


Neural Representation of Valenced and Generic Probability and Uncertainty.

Kim J, Hellrung L, Grueschow M, Nebe S, Nagy Z, Tobler P J Neurosci. 2024; 44(30).

PMID: 38866483 PMC: 11270512. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0195-24.2024.


References
1.
Tobler P, Dickinson A, Schultz W . Coding of predicted reward omission by dopamine neurons in a conditioned inhibition paradigm. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(32):10402-10. PMC: 6741002. View

2.
DArdenne K, McClure S, Nystrom L, Cohen J . BOLD responses reflecting dopaminergic signals in the human ventral tegmental area. Science. 2008; 319(5867):1264-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1150605. View

3.
Cassell M, Wright D . Topography of projections from the medial prefrontal cortex to the amygdala in the rat. Brain Res Bull. 1986; 17(3):321-33. DOI: 10.1016/0361-9230(86)90237-6. View

4.
Pearce J, Hall G . A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychol Rev. 1980; 87(6):532-52. View

5.
Rothe M, Quilodran R, Sallet J, Procyk E . Coordination of high gamma activity in anterior cingulate and lateral prefrontal cortical areas during adaptation. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(31):11110-7. PMC: 6623352. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1016-11.2011. View