» Articles » PMID: 38866483

Neural Representation of Valenced and Generic Probability and Uncertainty

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Jun 12
PMID 38866483
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Representing the probability and uncertainty of outcomes facilitates adaptive behavior by allowing organisms to prepare in advance and devote attention to relevant events. Probability and uncertainty are often studied only for valenced (appetitive or aversive) outcomes, raising the question of whether the identified neural machinery also processes the probability and uncertainty of motivationally neutral outcomes. Here, we aimed to dissociate valenced from valence-independent (i.e., generic) probability (; maximum at  = 1) and uncertainty (maximum at  = 0.5) signals using human neuroimaging. In a Pavlovian task ( = 41; 19 females), different cues predicted appetitive, aversive, or neutral liquids with different probabilities ( = 0,  = 0.5,  = 1). Cue-elicited motor responses accelerated, and pupil sizes increased primarily for cues that predicted valenced liquids with higher probability. For neutral liquids, uncertainty rather than probability tended to accelerate cue-induced responding and decrease pupil size. At the neural level, generic uncertainty signals were limited to the occipital cortex, while generic probability also activated the anterior ventromedial prefrontal cortex. These generic probability and uncertainty signals contrasted with cue-induced responses that only encoded the probability and uncertainty of valenced liquids in medial prefrontal, insular, and occipital cortices. Our findings show a behavioral and neural dissociation of generic and valenced signals. Thus, some parts of the brain keep track of motivational charge while others do not, highlighting the need and usefulness of characterizing the exact nature of learned representations.

Citing Articles

Social Risk Coding by Amygdala Activity and Connectivity with the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex.

Kim J, Zangemeister L, Tobler P, Schultz W, Grabenhorst F J Neurosci. 2024; 45(5).

PMID: 39592235 PMC: 11780354. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1149-24.2024.

References
1.
Spaniol J, Di Muro F, Ciaramelli E . Differential impact of ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage on "hot" and "cold" decisions under risk. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018; 19(3):477-489. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-00680-1. View

2.
Sharpe M, Killcross S . The prelimbic cortex contributes to the down-regulation of attention toward redundant cues. Cereb Cortex. 2012; 24(4):1066-74. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs393. View

3.
Roesch M, Esber G, Li J, Daw N, Schoenbaum G . Surprise! Neural correlates of Pearce-Hall and Rescorla-Wagner coexist within the brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2012; 35(7):1190-200. PMC: 3325511. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07986.x. View

4.
Avila I, Lin S . Motivational salience signal in the basal forebrain is coupled with faster and more precise decision speed. PLoS Biol. 2014; 12(3):e1001811. PMC: 3958335. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001811. View

5.
Mathot S . Pupillometry: Psychology, Physiology, and Function. J Cogn. 2019; 1(1):16. PMC: 6634360. DOI: 10.5334/joc.18. View