» Articles » PMID: 14614099

Coding of Predicted Reward Omission by Dopamine Neurons in a Conditioned Inhibition Paradigm

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2003 Nov 14
PMID 14614099
Citations 129
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animals learn not only about stimuli that predict reward but also about those that signal the omission of an expected reward. We used a conditioned inhibition paradigm derived from animal learning theory to train a discrimination between a visual stimulus that predicted reward (conditioned excitor) and a second stimulus that predicted the omission of reward (conditioned inhibitor). Performing the discrimination required attention to both the conditioned excitor and the inhibitor; however, dopamine neurons showed very different responses to the two classes of stimuli. Conditioned inhibitors elicited considerable depressions in 48 of 69 neurons (median of 35% below baseline) and minor activations in 29 of 69 neurons (69% above baseline), whereas reward-predicting excitors induced pure activations in all 69 neurons tested (242% above baseline), thereby demonstrating that the neurons discriminated between conditioned stimuli predicting reward versus nonreward. The discriminative responses to stimuli with differential reward-predicting but common attentional functions indicate differential neural coding of reward prediction and attention. The neuronal responses appear to reflect reward prediction errors, thus suggesting an extension of the correspondence between learning theory and activity of single dopamine neurons to the prediction of nonreward.

Citing Articles

Dopamine activity encodes the changing valence of the same stimulus in conditioned taste aversion paradigms.

Loh M, Hurh S, Bazzino P, Donka R, Keinath A, Roitman J Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 40042246 PMC: 11882140. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.103260.


Early Salience Signals Predict Interindividual Asymmetry in Decision Accuracy Across Rewarding and Punishing Contexts.

Westwood S, Philiastides M Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(17):e70072.

PMID: 39584595 PMC: 11586867. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70072.


Individual differences in decision-making shape how mesolimbic dopamine regulates choice confidence and change-of-mind.

Kocharian A, Redish A, Rothwell P bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39345599 PMC: 11429702. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.16.613237.


Pavlovian safety learning: An integrative theoretical review.

Laing P, Vervliet B, Dunsmoor J, Harrison B Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 32(1):176-202.

PMID: 39167292 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02559-4.


Encoding of Predictive Associations in Human Prefrontal and Medial Temporal Neurons During Pavlovian Appetitive Conditioning.

Aquino T, Courellis H, Mamelak A, Rutishauser U, O Doherty J J Neurosci. 2024; 44(17).

PMID: 38423764 PMC: 11044193. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1628-23.2024.


References
1.
Hollerman J, Schultz W . Dopamine neurons report an error in the temporal prediction of reward during learning. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 1(4):304-9. DOI: 10.1038/1124. View

2.
Redgrave P, Prescott T, Gurney K . Is the short-latency dopamine response too short to signal reward error?. Trends Neurosci. 1999; 22(4):146-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01373-3. View

3.
Granon S, Passetti F, Thomas K, Dalley J, Everitt B, Robbins T . Enhanced and impaired attentional performance after infusion of D1 dopaminergic receptor agents into rat prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2000; 20(3):1208-15. PMC: 6774157. View

4.
Horvitz J . Mesolimbocortical and nigrostriatal dopamine responses to salient non-reward events. Neuroscience. 2000; 96(4):651-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00019-1. View

5.
Waelti P, Dickinson A, Schultz W . Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory. Nature. 2001; 412(6842):43-8. DOI: 10.1038/35083500. View