» Articles » PMID: 22476443

Interphase Chromatin Organisation in Arabidopsis Nuclei: Constraints Versus Randomness

Overview
Journal Chromosoma
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2012 Apr 6
PMID 22476443
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The spatial chromatin organisation and molecular interactions within and between chromatin domains and chromosome territories (CTs) are essential for fundamental processes such as replication, transcription and DNA repair via homologous recombination. To analyse the distribution and interaction of whole CTs, centromeres, (sub)telomeres and ~100-kb interstitial chromatin segments in endopolyploid nuclei, specific FISH probes from Arabidopsis thaliana were applied to 2-64C differentiated leaf nuclei. Whereas CTs occupy a distinct and defined volume of the nucleus and do not obviously intermingle with each other in 2-64C nuclei, ~100-kb sister chromatin segments within these CTs become more non-cohesive with increasing endopolyploidy. Centromeres, preferentially located at the nuclear periphery, may show ring- or half-moon like shapes in 2C and 4C nuclei. Sister centromeres tend to associate up to the 8C level. From 16C nuclei on, they become progressively separated. The higher the polyploidy level gets, the more separate chromatids are present. Due to sister chromatid separation in highly endopolyploid nuclei, the centromeric histone variant CENH3, the 180-bp centromeric repeats and pericentromeric heterochromatin form distinct subdomains at adjacent but not intermingling positions. The (sub)telomeres are frequently associated with each other and with the nucleolus and less often with centromeres. The extent of chromatid separation and of chromatin decondensation at subtelomeric chromatin segments varies between chromosome arms. A mainly random distribution and similar shapes of CTs even at higher ploidy levels indicate that in general no substantial CT reorganisation occurs during endopolyploidisation. Non-cohesive sister chromatid regions at chromosome arms and at the (peri)centromere are accompanied by a less dense chromatin conformation in highly endopolyploid nuclei. We discuss the possible function of this conformation in comparison to transcriptionally active regions at insect polytene chromosomes.

Citing Articles

Microfluidics to Follow Spatiotemporal Dynamics at the Nucleo-Cytoplasmic Interface During Plant Root Growth.

Dupouy G, Singh G, Schmidt-Speicher L, Hoffmann E, Baudrey S, Ahrens R Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2873:223-245.

PMID: 39576605 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4228-3_13.


Establishing of 3D-FISH on frozen section and its applying in chromosome territories analysis in Populus trichocarpa.

Ning Y, Shang D, Xin H, Ni R, Wang Z, Zhen Y Plant Cell Rep. 2024; 43(11):255.

PMID: 39375198 DOI: 10.1007/s00299-024-03342-4.


A fine-scale Arabidopsis chromatin landscape reveals chromatin conformation-associated transcriptional dynamics.

Zhang Y, Dong Q, Wang Z, Liu Q, Yu H, Sun W Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):3253.

PMID: 38627396 PMC: 11021422. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47678-7.


Linker histone H1 drives heterochromatin condensation via phase separation in Arabidopsis.

He S, Yu Y, Wang L, Zhang J, Bai Z, Li G Plant Cell. 2024; 36(5):1829-1843.

PMID: 38309957 PMC: 11062459. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koae034.


3D organization of regulatory elements for transcriptional regulation in Arabidopsis.

Deng L, Zhou Q, Zhou J, Zhang Q, Jia Z, Zhu G Genome Biol. 2023; 24(1):181.

PMID: 37550699 PMC: 10405511. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-03018-4.


References
1.
Fransz P, de Jong J, Lysak M, Ruffini Castiglione M, Schubert I . Interphase chromosomes in Arabidopsis are organized as well defined chromocenters from which euchromatin loops emanate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(22):14584-9. PMC: 137926. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.212325299. View

2.
Mirny L . The fractal globule as a model of chromatin architecture in the cell. Chromosome Res. 2011; 19(1):37-51. PMC: 3040307. DOI: 10.1007/s10577-010-9177-0. View

3.
Verdaasdonk J, Bloom K . Centromeres: unique chromatin structures that drive chromosome segregation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011; 12(5):320-32. PMC: 3288958. DOI: 10.1038/nrm3107. View

4.
Onn I, Heidinger-Pauli J, Guacci V, Unal E, Koshland D . Sister chromatid cohesion: a simple concept with a complex reality. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2008; 24:105-29. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175350. View

5.
Schoenfelder S, Sexton T, Chakalova L, Cope N, Horton A, Andrews S . Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat Genet. 2009; 42(1):53-61. PMC: 3237402. DOI: 10.1038/ng.496. View