Critical Review of the Current Practice for Computer-assisted Navigation in Total Knee Replacement Surgery: Cost-effectiveness and Clinical Outcome

Overview

Journal Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med

Date 2011 Apr 9

PMID 21475560

Citations 18

Authors

Aravind S Desai

Asterios Dramis

Daniel Kendoff

Tim N Board

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In this article, we present a review of the current practice regarding computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement together with the bearing on cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome.

Citing Articles

Short-Term Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Conventional, Computer-Assisted, and Robotic Technique: A Pilot Clinical Trial.

Lychagin A, Gritsyuk A, Elizarov M, Rukin Y, Gritsyuk A, Gavlovsky M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892836 PMC: 11172941. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113125.

Smart Technology and Orthopaedic Surgery: Current Concepts Regarding the Impact of Smartphones and Wearable Technology on Our Patients and Practice.

Shah N, Gold R, Dar Q, Diebo B, Paulino C, Naziri Q Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021; 14(6):378-391.

PMID: 34729710 PMC: 8733100. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-021-09723-6.

A Novel Tracker-Less, Universal, Image-Based, Computer-Assisted Navigation in Orthopaedic Trauma- A pilot Study.

Goyal N, Panchnadikar V Indian J Orthop. 2021; 55(Suppl 2):466-472.

PMID: 34306562 PMC: 8275722. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00422-5.

Letter to the Editor: 2017 Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Does Computer Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty Improve Functional Outcomes in Young Patients? A Randomized Study.

Hazratwala K Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018; 476(6):1362-1363.

PMID: 29629936 PMC: 6263586. DOI: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000305.

What Factors are Associated With 90-day Episode-of-care Payments for Younger Patients With Total Joint Arthroplasty?.

Pathak S, Ganduglia C, Awad S, Chan W, Swint J, Morgan R Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475(11):2808-2818.

PMID: 28707110 PMC: 5638736. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-017-5444-0.

References

Felson D . Epidemiology of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Epidemiol Rev. 1988; 10:1-28. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036019. View

Chauhan S, Scott R, Breidahl W, Beaver R . Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(3):372-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14643. View

Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J . Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(5):682-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b5.14927. View

Nizard R . Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2002; 68(3):215-30. View

Delp S, Stulberg S, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F . Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; (354):49-56. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199809000-00007. View

Luring C, Bathis H, Tingart M, Perlick L, Grifka J . Computer assistance in total knee replacement - a critical assessment of current health care technology. Comput Aided Surg. 2006; 11(2):77-80. DOI: 10.3109/10929080600578925. View

Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A . Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85(6):830-5. View

Dorr L, Boiardo R . Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; (205):5-11. View

Parratte S, Pagnano M, Trousdale R, Berry D . Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(12):2143-9. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01398. View

10.

Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C . A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2):236-43. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00386. View

11.

Chauhan S, Clark G, Lloyd S, Scott R, Breidahl W, Sikorski J . Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(6):818-23. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.15456. View

12.

Sikorski J, Chauhan S . Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: do we need CAOS?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85(3):319-23. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.85b3.14212. View

13.

Dong H, Buxton M . Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: A Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006; 22(2):191-202. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462306051014. View

14.

Kalairajah Y, Simpson D, Cossey A, Verrall G, Spriggins A . Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(11):1480-2. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B11.16474. View

15.

Tennant A, Fear J, Pickering A, Hillman M, Cutts A, Chamberlain M . Prevalence of knee problems in the population aged 55 years and over: identifying the need for knee arthroplasty. BMJ. 1995; 310(6990):1291-3. PMC: 2549676. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.310.6990.1291. View

16.

Chin P, Yang K, Yeo S, Lo N . Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(5):618-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.004. View

17.

Anderson K, Buehler K, Markel D . Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(7 Suppl 3):132-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.05.009. View

18.

Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A . Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2):261-9. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00601. View

19.

Kane R, Saleh K, Wilt T, Bershadsky B, Cross 3rd W, Macdonald R . Total knee replacement. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2004; (86):1-8. PMC: 4781011. View