» Articles » PMID: 15330021

Computer-assisted Total Knee Replacement. A Controlled Cadaver Study Using a Multi-parameter Quantitative CT Assessment of Alignment (the Perth CT Protocol)

Overview
Date 2004 Aug 28
PMID 15330021
Citations 85
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A controlled study, comparing computer- and conventional jig-assisted total knee replacement in six cadavers is presented. In order to provide a quantitative assessment of the alignment of the replacements, a CT-based technique which measures seven parameters of alignment has been devised and used. In this a multi-slice CT machine scanned in 2.5 mm slices from the acetabular roof to the dome of the talus with the subject's legs held in a standard position. The mechanical and anatomical axes were identified, from three-dimensional landmarks, in both anteroposterior and lateral planes. The coronal and sagittal alignment of the prosthesis was then measured against the axes. The rotation of the femoral component was measured relative to the transepicondylar axis. The rotation of the tibial component was measured with reference to the posterior tibial condyles and the tibial tuberosity. Coupled femorotibial rotational alignment was assessed by superimposition of the femoral and tibial axial images. The radiation dose was 2.7 mSV. The computer-assisted total knee replacements showed better alignment in rotation and flexion of the femoral component, the posterior slope of the tibial component and in the matching of the femoral and tibial components in rotation. Differences were statistically significant and of a magnitude that support extension of computer assistance to the clinical situation.

Citing Articles

Computer-assisted revision total knee arthroplasty does not improve postoperative knee prosthesis alignment compared to the conventional technique.

Alling T, Conteh-Meijer M, Boerboom A, Stevens M, Reininga I J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(3):e12064.

PMID: 39021891 PMC: 11252016. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.12064.


Optimization of the "Perth CT" Protocol for Preoperative Planning and Postoperative Evaluation in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Stojadinovic M, Masulovic D, Kadija M, Milovanovic D, Milic N, Markovic K Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(1).

PMID: 38256359 PMC: 10818486. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010098.


A Three-dimensional Comparison of Pre- and Post-component Position in a Series of Off-label Robotic-assisted Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties.

MacAskill M, Peluso R, Lash J, Hewett T, Bullock M, Caughran A Arthroplast Today. 2024; 25:101310.

PMID: 38229867 PMC: 10788208. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101310.


Combined femoral and tibial component total knee arthroplasty device rotation measurement is reliable and predicts clinical outcome.

Hernandez-Hermoso J, Nescolarde L, Yanez-Siller F, Calle-Garcia J, Garcia-Perdomo D, Perez-Andres R J Orthop Traumatol. 2023; 24(1):40.

PMID: 37535276 PMC: 10400495. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00718-2.


Long leg radiographs underestimate the degree of constitutional varus limb alignment and joint line obliquity in comparison with computed tomography: a radiographic study.

Tarassoli P, Corban L, Wood J, Sergis A, Chen D, MacDessi S Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(11):4755-4765.

PMID: 37490128 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07505-w.