A Systematic Literature Review of Three Modalities in Technologically Assisted TKA

Overview

Journal Adv Orthop

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2015 Dec 15

PMID 26664755

Citations 2

Authors

William A Leone

Leah C Elson

Christopher R Anderson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In effort to reduce the revision burden of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), industry emphasis has focused on replacing manual techniques-which are subject to variability-with technological implements. Unfortunately, technological innovation often continues before adequate time for critical evaluation has passed. Therefore, the purpose of this descriptive literature review was to collect a large sample of international data and report on the clinical and economic efficacy of three major types of technologically assisted TKA: navigation, patient-specific instrumentation, and sensorized trials.

Citing Articles

Early outcomes of patient-specific posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty implants.

Wheatley B, Nappo K, Fisch J, Rego L, Shay M, Cannova C J Orthop. 2019; 16(1):14-18.

PMID: 30765928 PMC: 6355654. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.11.003.

Comment on "A Systematic Literature Review of Three Modalities in Technologically Assisted TKA".

Vaishya R, Gupta N, Vijay V, Agrawal A Adv Orthop. 2016; 2016:6539878.

PMID: 27239347 PMC: 4864568. DOI: 10.1155/2016/6539878.

References

Hakki S, Saleh K, Potty A, Bilotta V, Oliveira D . Columbus navigated TKA system: clinical and radiological results at a minimum of 5 years with survivorship analysis. Orthopedics. 2013; 36(3):e308-18. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20130222-19. View

Burnett R, Barrack R . Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 471(1):264-76. PMC: 3528921. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2528-8. View

Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S . Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 457:156-62. DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180316c92. View

Roche M, Elson L, Anderson C . A novel technique using sensor-based technology to evaluate tibial tray rotation. Orthopedics. 2015; 38(3):e217-22. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150305-60. View

Bae D, Song S . Computer assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011; 3(4):259-67. PMC: 3232352. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2011.3.4.259. View

Cip J, Widemschek M, Luegmair M, Sheinkop M, Benesch T, Martin A . Conventional versus computer-assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 5-year follow-up of 200 patients in a prospective randomized comparative trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(9):1795-802. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.037. View

Allen C, Hooper G, Oram B, Wells J . Does computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty improve the overall component position and patient function?. Int Orthop. 2013; 38(2):251-7. PMC: 3923953. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1996-0. View

DLima D, Patil S, Steklov N, Colwell Jr C . An ABJS Best Paper: Dynamic intraoperative ligament balancing for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 463:208-12. View

Anastasiadis A, Magnissalis E, Tsakonas A . A novel intraoperative sensor for soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. J Med Eng Technol. 2010; 34(7-8):448-54. DOI: 10.3109/03091902.2010.517898. View

10.

Novak E, Silverstein M, Bozic K . The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(11):2389-97. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01109. View

11.

Watters T, Mather 3rd R, Browne J, Berend K, Lombardi Jr A, Bolognesi M . Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011; 20(2):112-6. View

12.

Ajwani S, Jones M, Jarratt J, Shepard G, Ryan W . Computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement: a comparison of tourniquet time, blood loss and length of stay. Knee. 2011; 19(5):606-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.11.006. View

13.

Xie C, Liu K, Xiao L, Tang R . Clinical Outcomes After Computer-assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(5):e647-53. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120426-17. View

14.

Daniilidis K, Tibesku C . A comparison of conventional and patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2013; 38(3):503-8. PMC: 3936083. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2028-9. View

15.

Scholes C, Sahni V, Lustig S, Parker D, Coolican M . Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty does not match the pre-operative plan as assessed by intra-operative computer-assisted navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 22(3):660-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2670-1. View

16.

Meijer M, Reininga I, Boerboom A, Bulstra S, Stevens M . Does imageless computer-assisted TKA lead to improved rotational alignment or fewer outliers? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(10):3124-33. PMC: 4160487. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3688-5. View

17.

Cheng T, Zhao S, Peng X, Zhang X . Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 20(7):1307-22. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1588-8. View

18.

Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Iglesias-Fernandez S . Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(12):3436-42. PMC: 3210277. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2044-2. View

19.

Parratte S, Blanc G, Boussemart T, Ollivier M, Le Corroller T, Argenson J . Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21(10):2213-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2623-8. View

20.

Noble Jr J, Moore C, Liu N . The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 27(1):153-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.07.006. View