» Articles » PMID: 21098448

Myocardial Perfusion Scans: Projected Population Cancer Risks from Current Levels of Use in the United States

Overview
Journal Circulation
Date 2010 Nov 25
PMID 21098448
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Myocardial perfusion scans contribute up to 20% of the estimated annual collective radiation dose to the US population. We estimated potential future cancer risk from these scans by age at exposure and current frequency of use in the United States.

Methods And Results: Usage patterns were determined from national survey data, and radionuclide dosage was based on current guidelines. Cancer risk projection models were generated on the basis of the National Research Council Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII report, under the assumption that risk has a linear relationship with radiation exposure even at low doses. The mean projected number of radiation-related incident cancers and 95% uncertainty intervals were estimated with the use of Monte Carlo simulations. Estimated risks for a scan performed at age 50 years ranged from 2 cancers per 10,000 scans (95% uncertainty interval, 1 to 5) for a positron emission tomography ammonia-13 test to 25 cancers per 10,000 scans (95% uncertainty interval, 9 to 58) for a dual-isotope (thallium-201 plus technetium-99m) scan. Risks were 50% lower at age 70 years but were similar for men and women. The combination of cancer risk estimates and data on frequency of use suggests that the 9.1 million myocardial perfusion scans performed annually in the United States could result in 7400 (95% uncertainty interval, 3300 to 13,700) additional future cancers.

Conclusions: The lifetime cancer risk from a single myocardial perfusion scan is small and should be balanced against likely benefit and appropriateness of the test. The estimates depend on a number of assumptions, including life expectancy. They apply directly to asymptomatic individuals with life expectancies similar to those of the general population. For individuals with a symptomatic clinical profile, on whom such scans are typically performed, the risks will be lower because of shorter life expectancy.

Citing Articles

Evaluating Radiation Exposure in Patients with Stable Chest Pain in the SCOT-HEART Trial.

Chiong J, Ramkumar P, Weir N, Weir-McCall J, Nania A, Shaw L Radiology. 2023; 308(2):e221963.

PMID: 37526539 PMC: 10478793. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221963.


The Reversion of the Epigenetic Signature of Coronary Heart Disease in Response to Smoking Cessation.

Philibert R, Moody J, Philibert W, Dogan M, Hoffman E Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(6).

PMID: 37372412 PMC: 10297911. DOI: 10.3390/genes14061233.


Multimodality Imaging in the Detection of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.

Gaine S, Sharma G, Tower-Rader A, Botros M, Kovell L, Parakh A J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022; 9(10).

PMID: 36286302 PMC: 9604786. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9100350.


The effect of body mass index on high versus low administered activity protocol myocardial perfusion imaging scan time and effective dose using a cadmium zinc telluride camera in clinical practice.

Prasad K, Adams C, Quang E, Taylor J, Stocker D World J Nucl Med. 2021; 20(3):247-252.

PMID: 34703392 PMC: 8488894. DOI: 10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_123_20.


Ten things to know about ten imaging studies: A preventive cardiology perspective ("ASPC top ten imaging").

Bays H, Khera A, Blaha M, Budoff M, Toth P Am J Prev Cardiol. 2021; 6:100176.

PMID: 34327499 PMC: 8315431. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100176.


References
1.
Marwick T, Shaw L, Lauer M, Kesler K, Hachamovitch R, Heller G . The noninvasive prediction of cardiac mortality in men and women with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Study Group. Am J Med. 1999; 106(2):172-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00388-x. View

2.
Preston D, Mattsson A, Holmberg E, Shore R, Hildreth N, Boice Jr J . Radiation effects on breast cancer risk: a pooled analysis of eight cohorts. Radiat Res. 2002; 158(2):220-35. DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2002)158[0220:reobcr]2.0.co;2. View

3.
. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals (addendum 2 to ICRP publication 53). Ann ICRP. 2000; 28(3):1-126. DOI: 10.1016/s0146-6453(99)00006-8. View

4.
Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I . Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors. BMJ. 2004; 328(7455):1519. PMC: 437139. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.AE. View

5.
Einstein A . Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare?. Heart. 2008; 94(12):1519-21. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2007.135731. View