Hamasaki H, Arimura H, Yamasaki Y, Yamamoto T, Fukata M, Matoba T
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2024; .
PMID: 39739189
DOI: 10.1007/s13246-024-01503-z.
Ponsiglione A, De Giorgi M, Ascione R, Nappi C, Sanduzzi L, Pisani A
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(15).
PMID: 37568960
PMC: 10417643.
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13152598.
Sciagra R, Lubberink M, Hyafil F, Saraste A, Slart R, Agostini D
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020; 48(4):1040-1069.
PMID: 33135093
PMC: 7603916.
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05046-9.
Knott K, Seraphim A, Augusto J, Xue H, Chacko L, Aung N
Circulation. 2020; 141(16):1282-1291.
PMID: 32078380
PMC: 7176346.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044666.
Knott K, Augusto J, Nordin S, Kozor R, Camaioni C, Xue H
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12(7):e008872.
PMID: 31269811
PMC: 8323709.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.008872.
Diagnostic performance of semi-quantitative and quantitative stress CMR perfusion analysis: a meta-analysis.
van Dijk R, Assen M, Vliegenthart R, de Bock G, van der Harst P, Oudkerk M
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017; 19(1):92.
PMID: 29178905
PMC: 5702972.
DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0393-z.
Assessment of endothelial function and myocardial flow reserve using (15)O-water PET without attenuation correction.
Tuffier S, Legallois D, Belin A, Joubert M, Bailliez A, Redonnet M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 43(2):288-295.
PMID: 26280980
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3163-x.
Absorbed radiation dose in radiosensitive organs using 64- and 320-row multidetector computed tomography: a comparative study.
Khan A, Shuaib W, Nikolic B, Khan M, Kang J, Khosa F
Scientifica (Cairo). 2014; 2014:305942.
PMID: 25170427
PMC: 4142155.
DOI: 10.1155/2014/305942.
SPECT vs CT: CT is not the first line test for the diagnosis and prognosis of stable coronary artery disease.
Trzaska Z, Cohen M
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013; 20(3):473-8.
PMID: 23572316
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-013-9709-z.
The evolving practice of nuclear cardiology: results from the 2011 ASNC member survey.
Tilkemeier P, Green J, Einstein A, Fazel R, Reames P, Shaw L
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012; 19(6):1170-5.
PMID: 22996832
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-012-9624-8.
Effects of radiation exposure from cardiac imaging: how good are the data?.
Einstein A
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59(6):553-65.
PMID: 22300689
PMC: 3272627.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.079.
Strategies for defining an optimal risk-benefit ratio for stress myocardial perfusion SPECT.
Fazel R, Dilsizian V, Einstein A, Ficaro E, Henzlova M, Shaw L
J Nucl Cardiol. 2011; 18(3):385-92.
PMID: 21432002
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-011-9353-4.
Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction.
Eisenberg M, Afilalo J, Lawler P, Abrahamowicz M, Richard H, Pilote L
CMAJ. 2011; 183(4):430-6.
PMID: 21324846
PMC: 3050947.
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.100463.
Myocardial perfusion scans: projected population cancer risks from current levels of use in the United States.
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Kim K, Smith-Bindman R, McAreavey D
Circulation. 2010; 122(23):2403-10.
PMID: 21098448
PMC: 3548424.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.941625.
Preoperative coronary risk assessment with dual-source CT in patients undergoing noncoronary cardiac surgery.
Buffa V, De Cecco C, Cossu L, Fedeli S, Vallone A, Ruopoli R
Radiol Med. 2010; 115(7):1028-37.
PMID: 20221708
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-010-0543-y.
Radiation burden in myocardial imaging: an old concern in the new age of hi-tech, hybrid imaging.
Lucignani G
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009; 37(1):169-74.
PMID: 19921185
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1309-4.
Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion SPECT anatomically guided by coregistered 64-slice coronary CT angiography.
Slomka P, Cheng V, Dey D, Woo J, Ramesh A, Kriekinge S
J Nucl Med. 2009; 50(10):1621-30.
PMID: 19759104
PMC: 3530406.
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063982.
