» Articles » PMID: 21081559

Extensive Role of the General Regulatory Factors, Abf1 and Rap1, in Determining Genome-wide Chromatin Structure in Budding Yeast

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2010 Nov 18
PMID 21081559
Citations 71
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The packaging of eukaryotic DNA into chromatin has profound consequences for gene regulation, as well as for other DNA transactions such as recombination, replication and repair. Understanding how this packaging is determined is consequently a pressing problem in molecular genetics. DNA sequence, chromatin remodelers and transcription factors affect chromatin structure, but the scope of these influences on genome-wide nucleosome occupancy patterns remains uncertain. Here, we use high resolution tiling arrays to examine the contributions of two general regulatory factors, Abf1 and Rap1, to nucleosome occupancy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These factors have each been shown to bind to a few hundred promoters, but we find here that thousands of loci show localized regions of altered nucleosome occupancy within 1 h of loss of Abf1 or Rap1 binding, and that altered chromatin structure can occur via binding sites having a wide range of affinities. These results indicate that DNA-binding transcription factors affect chromatin structure, and probably dynamics, throughout the genome to a much greater extent than previously appreciated.

Citing Articles

High-Resolution Genome-Wide Maps Reveal Widespread Presence of Torsional Insulation.

Hall P, Mayse L, Bai L, Smolka M, Pugh B, Wang M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39416127 PMC: 11482950. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.11.617876.


Massively parallel binding assay (MPBA) reveals limited transcription factor binding cooperativity, challenging models of specificity.

Jana Lang T, Brodsky S, Manadre W, Vidavski M, Valinsky G, Mindel V Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(20):12227-12243.

PMID: 39413205 PMC: 11551769. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae846.


Hmo1: A versatile member of the high mobility group box family of chromosomal architecture proteins.

Bi X World J Biol Chem. 2024; 15(1):97938.

PMID: 39156122 PMC: 11325855. DOI: 10.4331/wjbc.v15.i1.97938.


Yeast heterochromatin stably silences only weak regulatory elements by altering burst duration.

Wu K, Dhillon N, Bajor A, Abrahamsson S, Kamakaka R Cell Rep. 2024; 43(4):113983.

PMID: 38517895 PMC: 11141299. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113983.


Epigenetic pioneering by SWI/SNF family remodelers.

Ahmad K, Brahma S, Henikoff S Mol Cell. 2023; 84(2):194-201.

PMID: 38016477 PMC: 10842064. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.10.045.


References
1.
van Helden J . Regulatory sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(13):3593-6. PMC: 168973. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg567. View

2.
Grunstein M . Molecular model for telomeric heterochromatin in yeast. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997; 9(3):383-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0955-0674(97)80011-7. View

3.
Radman-Livaja M, Rando O . Nucleosome positioning: how is it established, and why does it matter?. Dev Biol. 2009; 339(2):258-66. PMC: 2830277. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.06.012. View

4.
Goh W, Orlov Y, Li J, Clarke N . Blurring of high-resolution data shows that the effect of intrinsic nucleosome occupancy on transcription factor binding is mostly regional, not local. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010; 6(1):e1000649. PMC: 2799660. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000649. View

5.
Schroeder S, Weil P . Genetic tests of the role of Abf1p in driving transcription of the yeast TATA box bindng protein-encoding gene, SPT15. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273(31):19884-91. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.31.19884. View