» Articles » PMID: 20098497

Blurring of High-resolution Data Shows That the Effect of Intrinsic Nucleosome Occupancy on Transcription Factor Binding is Mostly Regional, Not Local

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Jan 26
PMID 20098497
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genome wide maps of nucleosome occupancy in yeast have recently been produced through deep sequencing of nuclease-protected DNA. These maps have been obtained from both crosslinked and uncrosslinked chromatin in vivo, and from chromatin assembled from genomic DNA and nucleosomes in vitro. Here, we analyze these maps in combination with existing ChIP-chip data, and with new ChIP-qPCR experiments reported here. We show that the apparent nucleosome density in crosslinked chromatin, when compared to uncrosslinked chromatin, is preferentially increased at transcription factor (TF) binding sites, suggesting a strategy for mapping generic transcription factor binding sites that would not require immunoprecipitation of a particular factor. We also confirm previous conclusions that the intrinsic, sequence dependent binding of nucleosomes helps determine the localization of TF binding sites. However, we find that the association between low nucleosome occupancy and TF binding is typically greater if occupancy at a site is averaged over a 600bp window, rather than using the occupancy at the binding site itself. We have also incorporated intrinsic nucleosome binding occupancies as weights in a computational model for TF binding, and by this measure as well we find better prediction if the high resolution nucleosome occupancy data is averaged over 600bp. We suggest that the intrinsic DNA binding specificity of nucleosomes plays a role in TF binding site selection not so much through the specification of precise nucleosome positions that permit or occlude binding, but rather through the creation of low occupancy regions that can accommodate competition from TFs through rearrangement of nucleosomes.

Citing Articles

Regulatory mechanisms of steroid hormone receptors on gene transcription through chromatin interaction and enhancer reprogramming.

Sun G, Zhao C, Han J, Wu S, Chen Y, Yao J Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2024; 47(6):2073-2090.

PMID: 39543064 DOI: 10.1007/s13402-024-01011-y.


Bioinformatics tools for the sequence complexity estimates.

Orlov Y, Orlova N Biophys Rev. 2023; 15(5):1367-1378.

PMID: 37974990 PMC: 10643780. DOI: 10.1007/s12551-023-01140-y.


Research Topics of the Bioinformatics of Gene Regulation.

Orlov Y, Anashkina A, Kumeiko V, Chen M, Kolchanov N Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(10).

PMID: 37240120 PMC: 10218204. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24108774.


Statistical estimates of multiple transcription factors binding in the model plant genomes based on ChIP-seq data.

Dergilev A, Orlova N, Dobrovolskaya O, Orlov Y J Integr Bioinform. 2021; 19(1).

PMID: 34953471 PMC: 9069649. DOI: 10.1515/jib-2020-0036.


Bioinformatics Applications to Reveal Molecular Mechanisms of Gene Expression Regulation in Model Organisms.

Orlov Y, Tatarinova T, Anashkina A Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(21).

PMID: 34769403 PMC: 8584893. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222111973.


References
1.
Yuan G, Liu J . Genomic sequence is highly predictive of local nucleosome depletion. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008; 4(1):e13. PMC: 2211532. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0040013. View

2.
Drew H, Travers A . DNA bending and its relation to nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol. 1985; 186(4):773-90. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90396-1. View

3.
Cherry J, Adler C, Ball C, Chervitz S, Dwight S, Hester E . SGD: Saccharomyces Genome Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26(1):73-9. PMC: 147204. DOI: 10.1093/nar/26.1.73. View

4.
Dion M, Kaplan T, Kim M, Buratowski S, Friedman N, Rando O . Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science. 2007; 315(5817):1405-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1134053. View

5.
Liu X, Lee C, Granek J, Clarke N, Lieb J . Whole-genome comparison of Leu3 binding in vitro and in vivo reveals the importance of nucleosome occupancy in target site selection. Genome Res. 2006; 16(12):1517-28. PMC: 1665635. DOI: 10.1101/gr.5655606. View