» Articles » PMID: 20805835

Advantages and Limitations of Current Network Inference Methods

Overview
Date 2010 Sep 1
PMID 20805835
Citations 216
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Network inference, which is the reconstruction of biological networks from high-throughput data, can provide valuable information about the regulation of gene expression in cells. However, it is an underdetermined problem, as the number of interactions that can be inferred exceeds the number of independent measurements. Different state-of-the-art tools for network inference use specific assumptions and simplifications to deal with underdetermination, and these influence the inferences. The outcome of network inference therefore varies between tools and can be highly complementary. Here we categorize the available tools according to the strategies that they use to deal with the problem of underdetermination. Such categorization allows an insight into why a certain tool is more appropriate for the specific research question or data set at hand.

Citing Articles

Development of a Pre-Modification Strategy to Overcome Restriction-Modification Barriers and Enhance Genetic Engineering in for Nisin Biosynthesis.

Chen C, Zhang Y, Chen R, Liu K, Wu H, Qiao J Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076820 PMC: 11900431. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26052200.


Approaches for Benchmarking Single-Cell Gene Regulatory Network Methods.

Karamveer , Uzun Y Bioinform Biol Insights. 2024; 18:11779322241287120.

PMID: 39502448 PMC: 11536393. DOI: 10.1177/11779322241287120.


Tensor product algorithms for inference of contact network from epidemiological data.

Dolgov S, Savostyanov D BMC Bioinformatics. 2024; 25(1):285.

PMID: 39223484 PMC: 11370089. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-024-05910-7.


Advances in computational and experimental approaches for deciphering transcriptional regulatory networks: Understanding the roles of cis-regulatory elements is essential, and recent research utilizing MPRAs, STARR-seq, CRISPR-Cas9, and machine....

Moeckel C, Mouratidis I, Chantzi N, Uzun Y, Georgakopoulos-Soares I Bioessays. 2024; 46(7):e2300210.

PMID: 38715516 PMC: 11444527. DOI: 10.1002/bies.202300210.


Causal connectivity measures for pulse-output network reconstruction: Analysis and applications.

Tian Z, Chen K, Li S, McLaughlin D, Zhou D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(14):e2305297121.

PMID: 38551842 PMC: 10998614. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2305297121.


References
1.
Grainger D, Hurd D, Goldberg M, Busby S . Association of nucleoid proteins with coding and non-coding segments of the Escherichia coli genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(16):4642-52. PMC: 1636352. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl542. View

2.
Nachman I, Regev A . BRNI: Modular analysis of transcriptional regulatory programs. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009; 10:155. PMC: 2694189. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-155. View

3.
Mendes P, Sha W, Ye K . Artificial gene networks for objective comparison of analysis algorithms. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19 Suppl 2:ii122-9. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1069. View

4.
Qi Y, Ge H . Modularity and dynamics of cellular networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007; 2(12):e174. PMC: 1761653. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020174. View

5.
Myers C, Troyanskaya O . Context-sensitive data integration and prediction of biological networks. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23(17):2322-30. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm332. View