» Articles » PMID: 37428809

Leveraging Epigenomes and Three-dimensional Genome Organization for Interpreting Regulatory Variation

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Jul 10
PMID 37428809
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding the impact of regulatory variants on complex phenotypes is a significant challenge because the genes and pathways that are targeted by such variants and the cell type context in which regulatory variants operate are typically unknown. Cell-type-specific long-range regulatory interactions that occur between a distal regulatory sequence and a gene offer a powerful framework for examining the impact of regulatory variants on complex phenotypes. However, high-resolution maps of such long-range interactions are available only for a handful of cell types. Furthermore, identifying specific gene subnetworks or pathways that are targeted by a set of variants is a significant challenge. We have developed L-HiC-Reg, a Random Forests regression method to predict high-resolution contact counts in new cell types, and a network-based framework to identify candidate cell-type-specific gene networks targeted by a set of variants from a genome-wide association study (GWAS). We applied our approach to predict interactions in 55 Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium cell types, which we used to interpret regulatory single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalogue. Using our approach, we performed an in-depth characterization of fifteen different phenotypes including schizophrenia, coronary artery disease (CAD) and Crohn's disease. We found differentially wired subnetworks consisting of known as well as novel gene targets of regulatory SNPs. Taken together, our compendium of interactions and the associated network-based analysis pipeline leverages long-range regulatory interactions to examine the context-specific impact of regulatory variation in complex phenotypes.

Citing Articles

Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Predicting 3D Genome Organization.

Wall B, Nguyen M, Harrell J, Dozmorov M Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2856:357-400.

PMID: 39283464 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4136-1_22.


Machine and deep learning methods for predicting 3D genome organization.

Wall B, Nguyen M, Harrell J, Dozmorov M ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38495565 PMC: 10942493.

References
1.
Forcato M, Nicoletti C, Pal K, Livi C, Ferrari F, Bicciato S . Comparison of computational methods for Hi-C data analysis. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(7):679-685. PMC: 5493985. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4325. View

2.
De Smet R, Marchal K . Advantages and limitations of current network inference methods. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010; 8(10):717-29. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2419. View

3.
Chiou J, Geusz R, Okino M, Han J, Miller M, Melton R . Interpreting type 1 diabetes risk with genetics and single-cell epigenomics. Nature. 2021; 594(7863):398-402. PMC: 10560508. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03552-w. View

4.
Langmead B, Salzberg S . Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(4):357-9. PMC: 3322381. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. View

5.
Weeks E, Ulirsch J, Cheng N, Trippe B, Fine R, Miao J . Leveraging polygenic enrichments of gene features to predict genes underlying complex traits and diseases. Nat Genet. 2023; 55(8):1267-1276. PMC: 10836580. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-023-01443-6. View