» Articles » PMID: 20803326

Implicit and Explicit Dosimetry in Photodynamic Therapy: a New Paradigm

Overview
Journal Lasers Med Sci
Publisher Springer
Date 2010 Aug 31
PMID 20803326
Citations 88
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dosimetry for photodynamic therapy (PDT) is becoming increasingly complex as more factors are identified which may influence the effectiveness of a given treatment. The simple prescription of a PDT treatment in terms of the administered photosensitizer dose, the incident light and the drug-light time interval does not account for patient-to-patient variability in either the photosensitizer uptake, tissue optical properties or tissue oxygenation, nor for the interdependence of the photosensitizer-light-tissue factors. This interdependence is examined and the implications for developing adequate dosimetry for PDT are considered. The traditional dosimetric approach, measuring each dose factor independently, and termed here 'explicit dosimetry', may be contrasted with the recent trend to use photosensitizer photobleaching as an index of the effective delivered dose, termed here 'implicit dosimetry'. The advantages and limitations of each approach are discussed, and the need to understand the degree to which the photobleaching mechanism is linked, or 'coupled', to the photosensitizing mechanism is analysed. Finally, the influence of the tissue-response endpoints on the optimal dosimetry methods is considered.

Citing Articles

Quantitative Fluorescence Imaging of Porphyrin Phospholipid Photobleaching and Light Activated Liposomal Doxorubicin Release Using Wide-field and Laparoscopic SFDI in an Ovarian Cancer Model.

Ahmmed R, Kluiszo E, Aygun-Sunar S, Willadsen M, Kutscher H, Lovell J Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 40034443 PMC: 11875292. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6030448/v1.


Analysis of Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Generated By Protoporphyrin IX.

Vikas V, Yang W, Wilson B, Zhu T, Hadfield R Antioxidants (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40002363 PMC: 11851838. DOI: 10.3390/antiox14020176.


In vivo, online label-free monitoring of heterogenous oxygen utilization during phototherapy with real-time ultrasound-guided photoacoustic imaging.

Langley A, Sweeney A, Shethia R, Bednarke B, Wulandana F, Xavierselvan M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39677615 PMC: 11642742. DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.27.625759.


Devices and Methods for Dosimetry of Personalized Photodynamic Therapy of Tumors: A Review on Recent Trends.

Alekseeva P, Makarov V, Efendiev K, Shiryaev A, Reshetov I, Loschenov V Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 39001546 PMC: 11240380. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132484.


First in human measurements of abscess cavity optical properties and methylene blue uptake prior to photodynamic therapy by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.

Hannan M, Sharma A, Baran T J Biomed Opt. 2024; 29(2):027002.

PMID: 38414658 PMC: 10898190. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.2.027002.


References
1.
Dodd N, Moore J, Poppitt D, Wood B . In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of the effects of photodynamic therapy. Br J Cancer. 1989; 60(2):164-7. PMC: 2247027. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1989.244. View

2.
Patterson M, Wilson B, Graff R . In vivo tests of the concept of photodynamic threshold dose in normal rat liver photosensitized by aluminum chlorosulphonated phthalocyanine. Photochem Photobiol. 1990; 51(3):343-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1990.tb01720.x. View

3.
Smith G, McGimpsey W, Lynch M, Kochevar I, Redmond R . An efficient oxygen independent two-photon photosensitization mechanism. Photochem Photobiol. 1994; 59(2):135-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1994.tb05012.x. View

4.
Bezdetnaya L, Zeghari N, Belitchenko I, Barberi-Heyob M, Merlin J, Potapenko A . Spectroscopic and biological testing of photobleaching of porphyrins in solutions. Photochem Photobiol. 1996; 64(2):382-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb02475.x. View

5.
Braichotte D, Savary J, Glanzmann T, Westermann P, Folli S, Wagnieres G . Clinical pharmacokinetic studies of tetra(meta-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin in squamous cell carcinoma by fluorescence spectroscopy at 2 wavelengths. Int J Cancer. 1995; 63(2):198-204. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910630209. View