» Articles » PMID: 20530698

Drug-induced Vessel Remodeling in Bone Metastases As Assessed by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Vessel Size Imaging: a Longitudinal in Vivo Study

Overview
Journal Clin Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Jun 10
PMID 20530698
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the antiangiogenic treatment effects of zoledronic acid (ZA) and sunitinib malate (SM) noninvasively in experimental breast cancer bone metastases by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and vessel size imaging.

Experimental Design: Nude rats bearing bone metastases after inoculation of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were treated with ZA (40 microg/kg weekly; n = 8 rats), SM (20 mg/kg daily; n = 8 rats), or their combination (ZA and SM; n = 8 rats) and compared with sham-treated controls (n = 10 rats). Vascular changes in bone metastases were longitudinally imaged in vivo using DCE-MRI [amplitude (A) and exchange rate coefficient (k(ep))] and vessel size imaging [blood volume (BV) and vessel size index (VI)]. In addition, antiresorptive and antitumor changes were assessed in these lesions by flat-panel volumetric computed tomography as well as morphologic MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging.

Results: In bone metastases, significant changes in A, k(ep), BV, and VI in accordance with decreased blood volume and vessel permeability as well as with increased mean vessel diameters were observed after application of ZA and SM as compared with controls. In this longitudinal study, antiangiogenic changes preceded the inhibition of osteolysis and antitumor effects after treatment.

Conclusions: These results indicate vessel remodeling in breast cancer bone metastases on ZA and SM treatment and implicate substantial effects on imaging and treatment of malignant bone lesions.

Citing Articles

Non-Invasive Characterization of Experimental Bone Metastasis in Obesity Using Multiparametric MRI and PET/CT.

Gregoric G, Gaculenko A, Nagel L, Popp V, Maschauer S, Prante O Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(10).

PMID: 35626085 PMC: 9139574. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102482.


Bone Metastases Are Measurable: The Role of Whole-Body MRI and Positron Emission Tomography.

Oprea-Lager D, Cysouw M, Boellaard R, Deroose C, de Geus-Oei L, Lopci E Front Oncol. 2021; 11:772530.

PMID: 34869009 PMC: 8640187. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.772530.


Functional and Hybrid Imaging of Bone Metastases.

Cook G, Goh V J Bone Miner Res. 2018; 33(6):961-972.

PMID: 29665140 PMC: 7616187. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3444.


Usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for predicting treatment response to vinorelbine-cisplatin with or without recombinant human endostatin in bone metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer.

Zhang R, Wang Z, Li Y, Lu Y, Wang S, Yu W Am J Cancer Res. 2017; 6(12):2890-2900.

PMID: 28042508 PMC: 5199762.


Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for the treatment of painful bone metastases: role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI in the assessment of clinical outcome.

Anzidei M, Napoli A, Sacconi B, Boni F, Noce V, Di Martino M Radiol Med. 2016; 121(12):905-915.

PMID: 27567615 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-016-0675-9.