» Articles » PMID: 27567615

Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Painful Bone Metastases: Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE) MRI in the Assessment of Clinical Outcome

Overview
Journal Radiol Med
Specialty Radiology
Date 2016 Aug 29
PMID 27567615
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess the correlation between functional MRI, including ADC values obtained from DWI and DCE, and clinical outcome in patients with bone metastases treated with MRgFUS.

Methods And Materials: Twenty-three patients with symptomatic bone metastases underwent MRgFUS treatment (ExAblate 2100 system InSightec) for pain palliation. All patients underwent clinical and imaging follow-up examinations at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate treatment efficacy in terms of pain palliation while ADC maps obtained by DWI sequences, and DCE data were used for quantitative assessment of treatment response at imaging. Spearman Correlation Coefficient Test was calculated to assess the correlation between VAS, ADC and DCE data.

Results: All treatments were performed successfully without adverse events. On the basis of VAS score, 16 (69.6 %) patients were classified as complete clinical responders, 6 (26.1 %) as partial responders and only one (4.3 %) was classified as a non-responder. The mean VAS score decreased from 7.09 ± 1.8 at baseline to 2.65 ± 1.36 at 1 month, 1.04 ± 1.91 at 3 months and 1.09 ± 1.99 at 6 months (p < 0.001). Baseline mean ADC value of treated lesions was 1.05 ± 0.15 mm/s, increasing along follow-up period (1.57 ± 0.27 mm/s 1st month; 1.49 ± 0.3 mm/s 3rd month; 1.45 ± 0.32 mm/s 6th month, p < 0.001). Non perfused volume (NPV) was 46.4 at 1 month, 45.2 at 3 months and 43.8 at 6 months. Spearman Coefficient demonstrated a statistically significant negative correlation between VAS and ADC values (ρ = -0.684; p = 0.03), but no significant correlation between VAS and NPV (ρ = 0.02216, p = 0.9305). Among other DCE data, Ktrans significantly changed in complete responders (3 months Ktrans = 2.14/min; -ΔKt = 52.65 % p < 0.01) and was not significantly different in partial responders (3 months Ktrans 0.042/min; ΔKt = 11.39 % p > 0.01).

Conclusion: In patients with painful bone metastases treated with MRgFUS, ADC and Ktrans variation observed in the ablated lesions correlate with VAS values and may play a role as objective imaging marker of treatment response.

Citing Articles

Nanoparticles and bone microenvironment: a comprehensive review for malignant bone tumor diagnosis and treatment.

Guan Y, Zhang W, Mao Y, Li S Mol Cancer. 2024; 23(1):246.

PMID: 39487487 PMC: 11529338. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-024-02161-1.


Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound versus percutaneous thermal ablation in local control of bone oligometastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Leporace M, Lancellotta V, Baccolini V, Calabria F, Castrovillari F, Filippiadis D Radiol Med. 2024; 129(2):291-306.

PMID: 38302831 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01780-4.


High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Bone Malignancies-20 Years of History.

Yeo S, Bratke G, Grull H Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(1).

PMID: 36612105 PMC: 9817683. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010108.


Tissue specific considerations in implementing high intensity focussed ultrasound under magnetic resonance imaging guidance.

deSouza N, Gedroyc W, Rivens I, Ter Haar G Front Oncol. 2022; 12:1037959.

PMID: 36387108 PMC: 9663991. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1037959.


Interventional Radiology in the Management of Metastases and Bone Tumors.

Sgalambro F, Zugaro L, Bruno F, Palumbo P, Salducca N, Zoccali C J Clin Med. 2022; 11(12).

PMID: 35743336 PMC: 9225477. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123265.


References
1.
Saip P, Tenekeci N, Aydiner A, Dincer M, Inanc S, Demir C . Response evaluation of bone metastases in breast cancer: value of magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Invest. 1999; 17(8):575-80. DOI: 10.3109/07357909909032842. View

2.
Low R, Gurney J . Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the oncology patient: value of breathhold DWI compared to unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25(4):848-58. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20864. View

3.
Biffar A, Sourbron S, Schmidt G, Ingrisch M, Dietrich O, Reiser M . Measurement of perfusion and permeability from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in normal and pathological vertebral bone marrow. Magn Reson Med. 2010; 64(1):115-24. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22415. View

4.
Vassiliou V, Andreopoulos D, Frangos S, Tselis N, Giannopoulou E, Lutz S . Bone metastases: assessment of therapeutic response through radiological and nuclear medicine imaging modalities. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011; 23(9):632-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.03.010. View

5.
Jambor I, Kuisma A, Ramadan S, Huovinen R, Sandell M, Kajander S . Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1.5T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial. Acta Oncol. 2015; 55(1):59-67. DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1027411. View