» Articles » PMID: 20454525

How Deeply Cells Feel: Methods for Thin Gels

Overview
Date 2010 May 11
PMID 20454525
Citations 123
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tissue cells lack the ability to see or hear but have evolved mechanisms to feel into their surroundings and sense a collective stiffness. A cell can even sense the effective stiffness of rigid objects that are not in direct cellular contact - like the proverbial princess who feels a pea placed beneath soft mattresses. How deeply a cell feels into a matrix can be measured by assessing cell responses on a controlled series of thin and elastic gels that are affixed to a rigid substrate. Gel elasticity E is readily varied with polymer concentrations of now-standard polyacrylamide hydrogels, but to eliminate wrinkling and detachment of thin gels from an underlying glass coverslip, vinyl groups are bonded to the glass before polymerization. Gel thickness is nominally specified using micron-scale beads that act as spacers, but gels swell after polymerization as measured by z-section, confocal microscopy of fluorescent gels. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is used to measure E at gel surfaces, employing stresses and strains that are typically generated by cells and yielding values for E that span a broad range of tissue microenvironments. To illustrate cell sensitivities to a series of thin-to-thick gels, the adhesive spreading of mesenchymal stem cells was measured on gel mimics of a very soft tissue (eg. brain, E ~ 1 kPa). Initial results show that cells increasingly respond to the rigidity of an underlying 'hidden' surface starting at about 10-20 microm gel thickness with a characteristic tactile length of less than about 5 microm.

Citing Articles

Dynamically changing extracellular matrix stiffness drives Schwann cell phenotype.

Montgomery A, Westphal J, Bryan A, Harris G Matrix Biol Plus. 2025; 25():100167.

PMID: 39868413 PMC: 11754676. DOI: 10.1016/j.mbplus.2024.100167.


Geometric constraint of mechanosensing by modification of hydrogel thickness prevents stiffness-induced differentiation in bone marrow stromal cells.

Hernandez-Miranda M, Xu D, Ben Issa A, Johnston D, Browne M, Cook R J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(219):20240485.

PMID: 39353563 PMC: 11444768. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0485.


A straightforward cell culture insert model to incorporate biochemical and biophysical stromal properties into transplacental transport studies.

Nelson K, Ferrick B, Karimi H, Hatem C, Gleghorn J Placenta. 2024; .

PMID: 39266436 PMC: 11880344. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2024.09.001.


Formulation Effects on the Mechano-Physical Properties of In Situ-Forming Resilient Hydrogels for Breast Tissue Regeneration.

Goder Orbach D, Zilberman M J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(7).

PMID: 39057298 PMC: 11277960. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15070176.


Integrating Mechanics and Bioactivity: A Detailed Assessment of Elasticity and Viscoelasticity at Different Scales in 2D Biofunctionalized PEGDA Hydrogels for Targeted Bone Regeneration.

Lopez-Serrano C, Cote-Paradis Y, Habenstein B, Loquet A, Le Coz C, Ruel J ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024; 16(30):39165-39180.

PMID: 39041490 PMC: 11600396. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.4c10755.


References
1.
Rowlands A, George P, Cooper-White J . Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008; 295(4):C1037-44. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.67.2008. View

2.
Georges P, Miller W, Meaney D, Sawyer E, Janmey P . Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. Biophys J. 2006; 90(8):3012-8. PMC: 1414567. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.073114. View

3.
Andrades J, Santamaria J, Nimni M, Becerra J . Selection and amplification of a bone marrow cell population and its induction to the chondro-osteogenic lineage by rhOP-1: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Dev Biol. 2001; 45(4):689-93. View

4.
Merkel R, Kirchgessner N, Cesa C, Hoffmann B . Cell force microscopy on elastic layers of finite thickness. Biophys J. 2007; 93(9):3314-23. PMC: 2025665. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.111328. View

5.
Ferrari G, Coletta M, Paolucci E, Stornaiuolo A, Cossu G, Mavilio F . Muscle regeneration by bone marrow-derived myogenic progenitors. Science. 1998; 279(5356):1528-30. DOI: 10.1126/science.279.5356.1528. View