» Articles » PMID: 20090830

A Bayesian Partition Method for Detecting Pleiotropic and Epistatic EQTL Modules

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Jan 22
PMID 20090830
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies of the relationship between DNA variation and gene expression variation, often referred to as "expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) mapping", have been conducted in many species and resulted in many significant findings. Because of the large number of genes and genetic markers in such analyses, it is extremely challenging to discover how a small number of eQTLs interact with each other to affect mRNA expression levels for a set of co-regulated genes. We present a Bayesian method to facilitate the task, in which co-expressed genes mapped to a common set of markers are treated as a module characterized by latent indicator variables. A Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is designed to search simultaneously for the module genes and their linked markers. We show by simulations that this method is more powerful for detecting true eQTLs and their target genes than traditional QTL mapping methods. We applied the procedure to a data set consisting of gene expression and genotypes for 112 segregants of S. cerevisiae. Our method identified modules containing genes mapped to previously reported eQTL hot spots, and dissected these large eQTL hot spots into several modules corresponding to possibly different biological functions or primary and secondary responses to regulatory perturbations. In addition, we identified nine modules associated with pairs of eQTLs, of which two have been previously reported. We demonstrated that one of the novel modules containing many daughter-cell expressed genes is regulated by AMN1 and BPH1. In conclusion, the Bayesian partition method which simultaneously considers all traits and all markers is more powerful for detecting both pleiotropic and epistatic effects based on both simulated and empirical data.

Citing Articles

Optimal variable identification for accurate detection of causal expression Quantitative Trait Loci with applications in heart-related diseases.

Wang G, Zhang H, Shao M, Tian M, Feng H, Li Q Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024; 23:2478-2486.

PMID: 38952424 PMC: 11215961. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.05.050.


Predictive network analysis identifies JMJD6 and other potential key drivers in Alzheimer's disease.

Merchant J, Zhu K, Henrion M, Zaidi S, Lau B, Moein S Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):503.

PMID: 37188718 PMC: 10185548. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04791-5.


A parallelized strategy for epistasis analysis based on Empirical Bayesian Elastic Net models.

Wen J, Ford C, Janies D, Shi X Bioinformatics. 2020; 36(12):3803-3810.

PMID: 32227194 PMC: 7320619. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa216.


Bayesian Partition Models for Identifying Expression Quantitative Trait Loci.

Jiang B, Liu J J Am Stat Assoc. 2017; 110(512):1350-1361.

PMID: 29056798 PMC: 5646422. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1049746.


Statistical Methods in Integrative Genomics.

Richardson S, Tseng G, Sun W Annu Rev Stat Appl. 2016; 3:181-209.

PMID: 27482531 PMC: 4963036. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-041715-033506.


References
1.
Morley M, Molony C, Weber T, Devlin J, Ewens K, Spielman R . Genetic analysis of genome-wide variation in human gene expression. Nature. 2004; 430(7001):743-7. PMC: 2966974. DOI: 10.1038/nature02797. View

2.
Lander E, Botstein D . Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989; 121(1):185-99. PMC: 1203601. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185. View

3.
Storey J, Akey J, Kruglyak L . Multiple locus linkage analysis of genomewide expression in yeast. PLoS Biol. 2005; 3(8):e267. PMC: 1180512. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030267. View

4.
Chen Y, Zhu J, Lum P, Yang X, Pinto S, MacNeil D . Variations in DNA elucidate molecular networks that cause disease. Nature. 2008; 452(7186):429-35. PMC: 2841398. DOI: 10.1038/nature06757. View

5.
Lee S, Peer D, Dudley A, Church G, Koller D . Identifying regulatory mechanisms using individual variation reveals key role for chromatin modification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(38):14062-7. PMC: 1599912. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0601852103. View