» Articles » PMID: 19834463

Comparison of Fat-water MRI and Single-voxel MRS in the Assessment of Hepatic and Pancreatic Fat Fractions in Humans

Overview
Date 2009 Oct 17
PMID 19834463
Citations 107
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to accurately and noninvasively quantify fatty infiltration in organs such as the liver and the pancreas remains a critical component in understanding the link between obesity and its comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes and fatty liver disease. Single-voxel ((1)H) proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) has long been regarded as the gold-standard noninvasive technique for such measurements. Recent advances in three-dimensional fat-water magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods have led to the development of rapid, robust, and quantitative approaches that can accurately characterize the proportion of fat and water content in underlying tissues across the full imaging volume, and hence entire organs of interest. One such technique is called IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition with Echo Asymmetry and Least squares estimation). This article prospectively compares three-dimensional (3D) IDEAL-MRI and single-voxel MRS in the assessment of hepatic (HFF) and pancreatic fat fraction (PFF) in 16 healthy subjects. MRS acquisitions took 3-4 min to complete whereas IDEAL acquisitions were completed in 20-s breath-holds. In the liver, there was a strong correlation (slope = 0.90, r(2) = 0.95, P < 0.001) between IDEAL and MRS-based fat fractions. In the pancreas, a poorer agreement between IDEAL and MRS was observed (slope = 0.32, r(2) = 0.51, P < 0.02). The discrepancy of PFF is likely explained by MRS signal contamination from surrounding visceral fat, presumably during respiratory motion. We conclude that IDEAL is equally accurate in characterizing hepatic fat content as MRS, and is potentially better suited for fat quantification in smaller organs such as the pancreas.

Citing Articles

Oxidative gaseous air pollutant exposure interacts with PNPLA3-I148M genotype to influence liver fat fraction and multi-omics profiles in young adults.

Patterson W, Young N, Holzhausen E, Lurmann F, Liang D, Walker D Environ Pollut. 2025; 368:125692.

PMID: 39864653 PMC: 11859754. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125692.


Association between intra-pancreatic fat deposition and diseases of the exocrine pancreas: A narrative review.

Ye J, Wang J, Liu R, Shi Q, Wang W World J Gastroenterol. 2025; 31(2):101180.

PMID: 39811515 PMC: 11684206. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i2.101180.


Effects of liraglutide on abdominal fat distribution and glucose metabolism in Chinese subjects with obesity.

Du M, Yue J, Qi Y, He S, Lu X, Yang M Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024; 16(1):307.

PMID: 39707524 PMC: 11660634. DOI: 10.1186/s13098-024-01540-4.


Ambient air pollution exposure is associated with liver fat and stiffness in Latino youth with a more pronounced effect in those with PNPLA3 genotype and more advanced liver disease.

Schenker R, Machle C, Allayee H, Lurmann F, Patterson W, Kohli R Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024; 286:117234.

PMID: 39454357 PMC: 11578286. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117234.


Associations of dietary sugars with liver stiffness in Latino adolescents with obesity differ on PNPLA3 and liver disease severity.

Schenker R, Machle C, Schmidt K, Allayee H, Kohli R, Goran M Liver Int. 2024; 44(8):1768-1774.

PMID: 38634702 PMC: 11251846. DOI: 10.1111/liv.15946.


References
1.
Naressi A, Couturier C, Castang I, de Beer R, Graveron-Demilly D . Java-based graphical user interface for MRUI, a software package for quantitation of in vivo/medical magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals. Comput Biol Med. 2001; 31(4):269-86. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4825(01)00006-3. View

2.
Cassidy F, Yokoo T, Aganovic L, Hanna R, Bydder M, Middleton M . Fatty liver disease: MR imaging techniques for the detection and quantification of liver steatosis. Radiographics. 2009; 29(1):231-60. DOI: 10.1148/rg.291075123. View

3.
Glover G, Schneider E . Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med. 1991; 18(2):371-83. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910180211. View

4.
Bernard C, Liney G, Manton D, Turnbull L, Langton C . Comparison of fat quantification methods: a phantom study at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 27(1):192-7. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21201. View

5.
Bergman R, Kim S, Hsu I, Catalano K, Chiu J, Kabir M . Abdominal obesity: role in the pathophysiology of metabolic disease and cardiovascular risk. Am J Med. 2007; 120(2 Suppl 1):S3-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.11.012. View