» Articles » PMID: 19472390

Quantification of Hepatic Steatosis with MRI: the Effects of Accurate Fat Spectral Modeling

Overview
Date 2009 May 28
PMID 19472390
Citations 121
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To develop a chemical-shift-based imaging method for fat quantification that accounts for the complex spectrum of fat, and to compare this method with MR spectroscopy (MRS). Quantitative noninvasive biomarkers of hepatic steatosis are urgently needed for the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Materials And Methods: Hepatic steatosis was measured with "fat-fraction" images in 31 patients using a multiecho chemical-shift-based water-fat separation method at 1.5T. Fat-fraction images were reconstructed using a conventional signal model that considers fat as a single peak at -210 Hz relative to water ("single peak" reconstruction). Fat-fraction images were also reconstructed from the same source images using two methods that account for the complex spectrum of fat; precalibrated and self-calibrated "multipeak" reconstruction. Single-voxel MRS that was coregistered with imaging was performed for comparison.

Results: Imaging and MRS demonstrated excellent correlation with single peak reconstruction (r(2) = 0.91), precalibrated multipeak reconstruction (r(2) = 0.94), and self-calibrated multipeak reconstruction (r(2) = 0.91). However, precalibrated multipeak reconstruction demonstrated the best agreement with MRS, with a slope statistically equivalent to 1 (0.96 +/- 0.04; P = 0.4), compared to self-calibrated multipeak reconstruction (0.83 +/- 0.05, P = 0.001) and single-peak reconstruction (0.67 +/- 0.04, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Accurate spectral modeling is necessary for accurate quantification of hepatic steatosis with MRI.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic performance of attenuation imaging versus controlled attenuation parameter for hepatic steatosis with MRI-based proton density fat fraction as the reference standard: a prospective multicenter study.

Nishimura T, Tada T, Akita T, Kondo R, Suzuki Y, Imajo K J Gastroenterol. 2025; .

PMID: 39992415 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-025-02224-0.


Assessment of calf muscle constitution in chronic Achilles tendon disease using Dixon-based MRI.

Goller S, Kajdi G, Wirth S, Snedeker J, Sutter R Skeletal Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39661156 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04845-7.


Application of proton density fat fraction imaging in risk stratification of prostate cancer.

Li G, Ding H, Tian Z, Huang Y, Li Y, Jiang N Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(9):1878-1890.

PMID: 39434740 PMC: 11491225. DOI: 10.21037/tau-24-232.


Bone Biomarkers Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Jerban S, Jang H, Chang E, Bukata S, Du J, Chung C Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2024; 28(1):62-77.

PMID: 38330971 PMC: 11786623. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776431.


Correlation between ultrasonography and MR proton density fat fraction techniques in evaluating the severity of liver steatosis.

Kizildag B, Baykara M, Yurttutan N, Vicdan H Hepatol Forum. 2024; 5(1):37-43.

PMID: 38283269 PMC: 10809335. DOI: 10.14744/hf.2023.2023.0046.


References
1.
Reeder S, Wen Z, Yu H, Pineda A, Gold G, Markl M . Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation method. Magn Reson Med. 2004; 51(1):35-45. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10675. View

2.
de Bazelaire C, Duhamel G, Rofsky N, Alsop D . MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. Radiology. 2004; 230(3):652-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2303021331. View

3.
Wong W, Northrup S, Herrick R, Glombicki A, Wood R, Morrisett J . Quantitation of lipid in biological tissue by chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1994; 32(4):440-6. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910320403. View

4.
Maharaj B, Maharaj R, Leary W, Cooppan R, Naran A, Pirie D . Sampling variability and its influence on the diagnostic yield of percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver. Lancet. 1986; 1(8480):523-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90883-4. View

5.
Bernard C, Liney G, Manton D, Turnbull L, Langton C . Comparison of fat quantification methods: a phantom study at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 27(1):192-7. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21201. View