» Articles » PMID: 19700150

How Couples Who Have Undergone in Vitro Fertilization Decide What to Do with Surplus Frozen Embryos

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2009 Aug 25
PMID 19700150
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In a qualitative interview study of 77 families with stored frozen embryos, we found that while embryo disposition decision making was influenced by individual life circumstances, embryo quantity/quality, personal values, embryo conceptualization, and clinic information, it was a stepwise process that could be represented as three sequential questions: (1) Will the embryos be used for additional attempts at conception? If not, (2) Will the embryos remain in storage? And if not, (3) Will the embryos be donated to other people or to science, or will they be destroyed? While almost two-thirds (63%) of participants kept their embryos in storage after 5 years, either passively through disagreement or indecision or actively to maintain embryo potential, avert feelings of loss, or as psychological or genetic "insurance," IVF clinic support and detailed information about options motivated families to make disposition decisions.

Citing Articles

Attitudes, concerns, and perceptions of patients undergoing fertility treatments in an abortion restrictive state in the aftermath of the Roe v. Wade reversal.

Sharifi M, Spurlin E, Vatan N, Quinones H, Santana E, Omurtag K J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(7):1703-1711.

PMID: 38850329 PMC: 11263275. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03145-2.


A systematic review of assisted and third-party reproduction guidelines regarding management and care of donors.

Iranifard E, Ebrahimzadeh Zagami S, Amirian M, Ebrahimipour H, Latifnejad Roudsari R Reprod Health. 2024; 21(1):75.

PMID: 38824591 PMC: 11143578. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01804-2.


Embryo cryopreservation and utilization in the United States from 2004-2013.

Christianson M, Stern J, Sun F, Zhang H, Styer A, Vitek W F S Rep. 2021; 1(2):71-77.

PMID: 34223221 PMC: 8244341. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.05.010.


Recent trends in embryo disposition choices made by patients following in vitro fertilization.

Alexander V, Riley J, Jungheim E J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020; 37(11):2797-2804.

PMID: 32816130 PMC: 7642147. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01927-y.


The main will of the patients of a private Italian IVF clinic for their aneuploid/affected blastocysts would be donation to research: a currently forbidden choice.

Faustini F, Forte M, Capalbo A, Cimadomo D, Ubaldi F, Rienzi L J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36(8):1555-1560.

PMID: 31134411 PMC: 6708053. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01465-2.


References
1.
Fuscaldo G, Russell S, Gillam L . How to facilitate decisions about surplus embryos: patients' views. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(12):3129-38. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem325. View

2.
Hammarberg K, Tinney L . Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples' decisions and the factors influencing their choice. Fertil Steril. 2006; 86(1):86-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.071. View

3.
de Lacey S . Parent identity and 'virtual' children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20(6):1661-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh831. View

4.
Bangsboll S, Pinborg A, Andersen C, Nyboe Andersen A . Patients' attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19(10):2415-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh441. View

5.
de Lacey S . Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: fresh insights into patients' thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding embryos. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(6):1751-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem056. View