Deciding the Fate of Supernumerary Frozen Embryos: a Survey of Couples' Decisions and the Factors Influencing Their Choice
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To investigate the decisions that couples make regarding supernumerary frozen embryos, the factors influencing these decisions, and the degree of difficulty involved in reaching a decision; and to canvass attitudes toward donating embryos to stem-cell research.
Design: Anonymous postal survey.
Setting: A large, private IVF clinic in a major city in Victoria, Australia.
Patient(s): A consecutive cohort of couples who contacted the Monash IVF clinic in relation to embryos in long-term storage.
Intervention(s): Subjects completed a survey regarding decisions about surplus frozen embryos.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Couples' decision regarding supernumerary embryos and reasons for the decision, experience of deciding, and attitudes about embryo donation for stem-cell research.
Result(s): Forty percent (123/311) returned completed questionnaires. The most common decision was donation to research (42%). Altruistic motives and desire not to waste embryos were determinants of embryo donation. Determinants of disposal were not wanting a full sibling to existing children and opposition of embryo research. Forty-five percent found deciding distressing. The majority (69%) approved of embryo donation to stem-cell research.
Conclusion(s): Most couples preferred embryos to come to some use rather than being disposed of. Almost half the sample reported finding the decision making distressing. A majority approved of embryo donation for stem-cell research.
Too many embryos: a critical perspective on a global challenge.
Bartolacci A, Dolci C, Pagliardini L, Papaleo E J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(7):1821-1824.
PMID: 38839697 PMC: 11263306. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03159-w.
Association between donor gamete use and supernumerary embryo disposition decisions.
Tsai S, Hynes J, Zanolli N, Raburn D, Steiner A J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 40(2):371-379.
PMID: 36529830 PMC: 9935759. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02690-y.
Kvernflaten B, Fedorcsak P, Solbraekke K J Bioeth Inq. 2022; 19(4):571-585.
PMID: 36331714 PMC: 9908683. DOI: 10.1007/s11673-022-10214-7.
Drevin J, Nyholm D, Widner H, van Vliet T, Johansson J, Jiltsova E BMC Med Ethics. 2022; 23(1):102.
PMID: 36261826 PMC: 9579517. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00840-6.
Disposition preferences in oocyte preservation patients.
Hutchinson A, Hosakoppal S, Trotter K, Confino R, Zhang J, Klock S J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 39(7):1619-1624.
PMID: 35587300 PMC: 9365913. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02518-9.