Contesting Estimates of Cryopreserved Embryos in the United States
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles
Cryostorage failures: a medicolegal review.
Moutos C, Lahham R, Phelps J J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36(6):1041-1048.
PMID: 31127476 PMC: 6603075. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01478-x.
Human embryos and eggs: from long-term storage to biobanking.
Baylis F, Widdows H Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015; 33(4):340-59.
PMID: 26699138 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-015-0045-8.
Reply to Contesting estimates of cryopreserved embryos in the United States.
Nat Biotechnol. 2015; 33(9):909.
PMID: 26348955 DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3348.
References
1.
Hoffman D, Zellman G, Fair C, Mayer J, Zeitz J, Gibbons W
. Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research. Fertil Steril. 2003; 79(5):1063-9.
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00172-9.
View
2.
Beesley R, Robinson R, Propst A, Arthur N, Retzloff M
. Impact of day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer on pregnancy rates and multiple gestations. Fertil Steril. 2008; 91(5):1717-20.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.003.
View
3.
Nachtigall R, Mac Dougall K, Harrington J, Duff J, Lee M, Becker G
. How couples who have undergone in vitro fertilization decide what to do with surplus frozen embryos. Fertil Steril. 2009; 92(6):2094-6.
PMC: 2789837.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.06.027.
View
4.
Lomax G, Trounson A
. Correcting misperceptions about cryopreserved embryos and stem cell research. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31(4):288-90.
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2541.
View