» Articles » PMID: 16410332

Comparative Assessment of Pre- and Post-donation Attitudes Towards Potential Oocyte and Embryo Disposition and Management Among Ovum Donors in an Oocyte Donation Programme

Overview
Journal Hum Reprod
Date 2006 Jan 18
PMID 16410332
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In anonymous oocyte donation programmes, the disposition of retrieved oocytes and subsequent embryo management are at the discretion of the IVF programme and the oocyte recipients, as donors waive all rights following their donation. Nonetheless, donors are routinely made aware of ways in which oocytes and resulting embryos may be used and elect to proceed with the process even in the presence of reservations to some clinical scenarios before their donation. The aim of our study was to examine oocyte donors' attitudes to oocyte and embryo disposition and management and how initial reservations change over the course of the donation process.

Methods: Oocyte donors in a university-based IVF programme were asked about their willingness to donate in relation to various clinical scenarios during the initial screening interview and at the post-donation exit interview. Results were tabulated as 'yes' or 'no'.

Results: At the pre-donation interview, 72% of donor candidates expressed reservations to one or more clinical scenarios. More reservations were expressed at the post-donation interview compared with the pre-donation interview. The greatest reservations were donating to recipients >50 years of age (P < 0.05). Despite this, 97% of donors were willing to donate again.

Conclusion: Oocyte donors' attitudes towards various clinical scenarios changed following their donation, reflecting overall greater reservations following the donation process. Although speculative, donors may be more willing to assert their opinions or donor attitudes become more restrictive.

Citing Articles

Exploring the knowledge and attitudes of women of reproductive age from the general public towards egg donation and egg sharing: a UK-based study.

Bracewell-Milnes T, Holland J, Jones B, Saso S, Almeida P, Maclaran K Hum Reprod. 2021; 36(8):2189-2201.

PMID: 34227667 PMC: 8648294. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab157.


Recent trends in embryo disposition choices made by patients following in vitro fertilization.

Alexander V, Riley J, Jungheim E J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020; 37(11):2797-2804.

PMID: 32816130 PMC: 7642147. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01927-y.


Gamete donors' satisfaction; gender differences and similarities among oocyte and sperm donors in a national sample.

Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C, Gejerwall A, Gudmundsson J, Karlstrom P, Solensten N Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013; 92(9):1049-56.

PMID: 23611727 PMC: 3933731. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12156.


What do patients want? Expectations and perceptions of IVF clinic information and support regarding frozen embryo disposition.

Nachtigall R, Mac Dougall K, Lee M, Harrington J, Becker G Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(6):2069-72.

PMID: 20359706 PMC: 2965265. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.023.


How couples who have undergone in vitro fertilization decide what to do with surplus frozen embryos.

Nachtigall R, Mac Dougall K, Harrington J, Duff J, Lee M, Becker G Fertil Steril. 2009; 92(6):2094-6.

PMID: 19700150 PMC: 2789837. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.06.027.