» Articles » PMID: 19573224

The Gene Expression Grade Index: a Potential Predictor of Relapse for Endocrine-treated Breast Cancer Patients in the BIG 1-98 Trial

Abstract

Background: We have previously shown that the Gene expression Grade Index (GGI) was able to identify two subtypes of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors that were associated with statistically distinct clinical outcomes in both untreated and tamoxifen-treated patients. Here, we aim to investigate the ability of the GGI to predict relapses in postmenopausal women who were treated with tamoxifen (T) or letrozole (L) within the BIG 1-98 trial.

Methods: We generated gene expression profiles (Affymetrix) and computed the GGI for a matched, case-control sample of patients enrolled in the BIG 1-98 trial from the two hospitals where frozen samples were available. All relapses (cases) were identified from patients randomized to receive monotherapy or from the switching treatment arms for whom relapse occurred before the switch. Each case was randomly matched with four controls based upon nodal status and treatment (T or L). The prognostic value of GGI was assessed as a continuous predictor and divided at the median. Predictive accuracy of GGI was estimated using time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curves.

Results: Frozen samples were analyzable for 48 patients (10 cases and 38 controls). Seven of the 10 cases had been assigned to receive L. Cases and controls were comparable with respect to menopausal and nodal status, local and chemotherapy, and HER2 positivity. Cases were slightly older than controls and had a larger proportion of large, poorly differentiated ER+/PgR- tumors. The GGI was significantly and linearly related to risk of relapse: each 10-unit increase in GGI resulted in an increase of approximately 11% in the hazard rate (p = 0.02). Within the subgroups of patients with node-positive disease or who were treated with L, the hazard of relapse was significantly greater for patients with GGI at or above the median. AUC reached a maximum of 78% at 27 months.

Conclusion: This analysis supports the GGI as a good predictor of relapse for ER-positive patients, even among patients who receive L. Validation of these results, in a larger series from BIG 1-98, is planned using the simplified GGI represented by a smaller set of genes and tested by qRT-PCR on paraffin-embedded tissues.

Citing Articles

Exploration of drug resistance mechanisms in triple negative breast cancer cells using a microfluidic device and patient tissues.

Lim W, Hwang I, Zhang J, Chen Z, Han J, Jeon J Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38536720 PMC: 10972559. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.88830.


Decision Theory versus Conventional Statistics for Personalized Therapy of Breast Cancer.

Kenn M, Karch R, Cacsire Castillo-Tong D, Singer C, Koelbl H, Schreiner W J Pers Med. 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35455687 PMC: 9028435. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040570.


Synthetic lethality-mediated precision oncology via the tumor transcriptome.

Lee J, Nair N, Dinstag G, Chapman L, Chung Y, Wang K Cell. 2021; 184(9):2487-2502.e13.

PMID: 33857424 PMC: 9310669. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.030.


Genomic Assays in Node Positive Breast Cancer Patients: A Review.

Zerdan M, Ibrahim M, El Nakib C, Hajjar R, Assi H Front Oncol. 2021; 10:609100.

PMID: 33665165 PMC: 7921691. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.609100.


Role of FUT8 expression in clinicopathology and patient survival for various malignant tumor types: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ma M, Han G, Wang Y, Zhao Z, Guan F, Li X Aging (Albany NY). 2020; 13(2):2212-2230.

PMID: 33323540 PMC: 7880376. DOI: 10.18632/aging.202239.


References
1.
Coombes R, Kilburn L, Snowdon C, Paridaens R, Coleman R, Jones S . Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2-3 years' tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007; 369(9561):559-70. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60200-1. View

2.
Sotiriou C, Wirapati P, Loi S, Harris A, Fox S, Smeds J . Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006; 98(4):262-72. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj052. View

3.
Heagerty P, Zheng Y . Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves. Biometrics. 2005; 61(1):92-105. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.030814.x. View

4.
Chen S, Masri S, Wang X, Phung S, Yuan Y, Wu X . What do we know about the mechanisms of aromatase inhibitor resistance?. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2006; 102(1-5):232-40. PMC: 1829446. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.09.012. View

5.
Rasmussen B, Regan M, Lykkesfeldt A, DellOrto P, Del Curto B, Henriksen K . Adjuvant letrozole versus tamoxifen according to centrally-assessed ERBB2 status for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: supplementary results from the BIG 1-98 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007; 9(1):23-8. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70386-8. View