» Articles » PMID: 28704710

Dissecting the Biological Heterogeneity Within Hormone Receptor Positive HER2 Negative Breast Cancer by Gene Expression Markers Identifies Indolent Tumors Within Late Stage Disease

Abstract

Hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancers are a heterogeneous class with differential prognosis. Although more than half of Indian women present with advanced disease, many such patients do well. We have attempted identification of biologically indolent tumors within HR+HER2- tumors based on gene expression using histological grade as a guide to tumor aggression. 144 HR+HER2- tumors were divided into subclasses based on scores derived by using transcript levels of multiple genes representing survival, proliferation, and apoptotic pathways and compared to classification by Ki-67 labeling index (LI). Clinical characters and disease free survival were compared between the subclasses. The findings were independently validated in the METABRIC data set. Using the previously established estrogen receptor (ER) down stream activity equation, 20% of the tumors with greater than 10% HR positivity by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were still found to have inadequate ER function. A tumor aggression probability score was used to segregate the remainder of tumors into indolent (22%) and aggressive (58%) classes. Significant difference in disease specific survival was seen between the groups (P = .02). Aggression probability based subclassification had a higher hazard ratio and also independent prognostic value (P<.05). Independent validation of the gene panel in the METABRIC data set showed all 3 classes; indolent (24%), aggressive (68%), and insufficient ER signaling (7%) with differential survival (P = .01). In agreement with other recent reports, biologically indolent tumors can be identified with small sets of gene panels and these tumors exist in a population with predominantly late stage disease.

Citing Articles

Elucidating the Role of MicroRNA-18a in Propelling a Hybrid Epithelial-Mesenchymal Phenotype and Driving Malignant Progression in ER-Negative Breast Cancer.

Nair M, Mavatkar A, Naidu C, V P S, C E A, Rajarajan S Cells. 2024; 13(10.

PMID: 38786043 PMC: 11119613. DOI: 10.3390/cells13100821.


Cell State Transitions and Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Luminal Breast Cancer Implicating MicroRNAs as Potential Regulators.

Richard V, Nair M, Jaikumar V, Jones S, Prabhu J, Kerin M Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(4).

PMID: 36834918 PMC: 9967449. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043497.


A Novel YTHDF3-Based Model to Predict Prognosis and Therapeutic Response in Breast Cancer.

Liu J, Zhu J, Wang X, Zhou Z, Liu H, Zhu D Front Mol Biosci. 2022; 9:874532.

PMID: 35755811 PMC: 9218665. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.874532.


AK4 Promotes the Progression of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer by Facilitating Cell Proliferation and Invasion.

Zhang J, Yin Y, Wu C, Qiu R, Jiang W, Deng X Dis Markers. 2019; 2019:8186091.

PMID: 31827645 PMC: 6886328. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8186091.


Heterocellular gene signatures reveal luminal-A breast cancer heterogeneity and differential therapeutic responses.

Poudel P, Nyamundanda G, Patil Y, Chon U Cheang M, Sadanandam A NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019; 5:21.

PMID: 31396557 PMC: 6677833. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-019-0116-8.

References
1.
Desmedt C, Giobbie-Hurder A, Neven P, Paridaens R, Christiaens M, Smeets A . The Gene expression Grade Index: a potential predictor of relapse for endocrine-treated breast cancer patients in the BIG 1-98 trial. BMC Med Genomics. 2009; 2:40. PMC: 2713270. DOI: 10.1186/1755-8794-2-40. View

2.
Prabhu J, Korlimarla A, Desai K, Alexander A, Raghavan R, Anupama C . A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors. J Cancer. 2014; 5(2):156-65. PMC: 3930907. DOI: 10.7150/jca.7668. View

3.
Blows F, Driver K, Schmidt M, Broeks A, van Leeuwen F, Wesseling J . Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(5):e1000279. PMC: 2876119. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000279. View

4.
Cardoso F, Vant Veer L, Bogaerts J, Slaets L, Viale G, Delaloge S . 70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(8):717-29. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602253. View

5.
Henson D, Ries L, Freedman L, Carriaga M . Relationship among outcome, stage of disease, and histologic grade for 22,616 cases of breast cancer. The basis for a prognostic index. Cancer. 1991; 68(10):2142-9. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19911115)68:10<2142::aid-cncr2820681010>3.0.co;2-d. View