» Articles » PMID: 19542392

In Defense of Body CT

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2009 Jun 23
PMID 19542392
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Rapid technical developments and an expanding list of applications that have supplanted less accurate or more invasive diagnostic tests have led to a dramatic increase in the use of body CT in medical practice since its introduction in 1975. Our purpose here is to discuss medical justification of the small potential risk associated with the ionizing radiation used in CT and to provide perspectives on practice-specific decisions that can maximize overall patient benefit. In addition, we review available dose management and optimization techniques.

Conclusion: Dose reduction strategies described in this article must be well understood and properly used, but also require broad-based practice strategies that extend beyond the CT scanner console and default, generic manufacturer settings. In the final analysis, physicians must request the imaging examination that best addresses the specific medical question without allowing worries about radiation to dissuade them or their patients from obtaining needed CT examinations. Ongoing efforts to ensure that CT examinations are both medically justified and optimally performed must continue, and education must be provided to the medical community and general public that put both the potential risks--and benefits--of CT examinations into proper perspective.

Citing Articles

State-of-the-Art Deep Learning CT Reconstruction Algorithms in Abdominal Imaging.

Mileto A, Yu L, Revels J, Kamel S, Shehata M, Ibarra-Rovira J Radiographics. 2024; 44(12):e240095.

PMID: 39612283 PMC: 11618294. DOI: 10.1148/rg.240095.


Optimizing image quality and minimizing radiation dose in pediatric abdominal multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography: a study on CARE kV and CARE Dose 4D.

Tian X, Chang Z, Dilixiati S, Haimiti Y, Wang S, Sun J Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(2):1985-1993.

PMID: 38415123 PMC: 10895141. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1181.


The why, who, how, and what of communicating CT radiation risks to patients and healthcare providers.

Mroueh N, Parakh A, Serrao J, Lee S, Eisner B, Gervais D Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023; 48(4):1514-1525.

PMID: 36799998 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03778-w.


Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography.

Bos D, Guberina N, Zensen S, Opitz M, Forsting M, Wetter A Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023; 120(9):135-141.

PMID: 36633449 PMC: 10198168. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0395.


Reader Performance as a Function of Patient Size for the Detection of Hepatic Metastases.

Gong H, Yu L, Leng S, Fletcher J, McCollough C J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2021; 45(6):812-819.

PMID: 34347711 PMC: 8599620. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001200.


References
1.
Hollingsworth C, Frush D, Cross M, Lucaya J . Helical CT of the body: a survey of techniques used for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180(2):401-6. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800401. View

2.
Studdert D, Mello M, Sage W, DesRoches C, Peugh J, Zapert K . Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA. 2005; 293(21):2609-17. DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2609. View

3.
Megibow A, Balthazar E, Cho K, Medwid S, Birnbaum B, Noz M . Bowel obstruction: evaluation with CT. Radiology. 1991; 180(2):313-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.180.2.2068291. View

4.
Geleijns J, Salvado Artells M, Veldkamp W, Lopez Tortosa M, Calzado Cantera A . Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(10):2334-40. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0217-2. View

5.
Paterson A, Frush D . Dose reduction in paediatric MDCT: general principles. Clin Radiol. 2007; 62(6):507-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.12.004. View