» Articles » PMID: 18799557

Accuracy of CT Colonography for Detection of Large Adenomas and Cancers

Abstract

Background: Computed tomographic (CT) colonography is a noninvasive option in screening for colorectal cancer. However, its accuracy as a screening tool in asymptomatic adults has not been well defined.

Methods: We recruited 2600 asymptomatic study participants, 50 years of age or older, at 15 study centers. CT colonographic images were acquired with the use of standard bowel preparation, stool and fluid tagging, mechanical insufflation, and multidetector-row CT scanners (with 16 or more rows). Radiologists trained in CT colonography reported all lesions measuring 5 mm or more in diameter. Optical colonoscopy and histologic review were performed according to established clinical protocols at each center and served as the reference standard. The primary end point was detection by CT colonography of histologically confirmed large adenomas and adenocarcinomas (10 mm in diameter or larger) that had been detected by colonoscopy; detection of smaller colorectal lesions (6 to 9 mm in diameter) was also evaluated.

Results: Complete data were available for 2531 participants (97%). For large adenomas and cancers, the mean (+/-SE) per-patient estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve for CT colonography were 0.90+/-0.03, 0.86+/-0.02, 0.23+/-0.02, 0.99+/-<0.01, and 0.89+/-0.02, respectively. The sensitivity of 0.90 (i.e., 90%) indicates that CT colonography failed to detect a lesion measuring 10 mm or more in diameter in 10% of patients. The per-polyp sensitivity for large adenomas or cancers was 0.84+/-0.04. The per-patient sensitivity for detecting adenomas that were 6 mm or more in diameter was 0.78.

Conclusions: In this study of asymptomatic adults, CT colonographic screening identified 90% of subjects with adenomas or cancers measuring 10 mm or more in diameter. These findings augment published data on the role of CT colonography in screening patients with an average risk of colorectal cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00084929; American College of Radiology Imaging Network [ACRIN] number, 6664.)

Citing Articles

Development and validation of computer-aided detection for colorectal neoplasms using deep learning incorporated with computed tomography colonography.

Endo S, Nagata K, Utano K, Nozu S, Yasuda T, Takabayashi K BMC Gastroenterol. 2025; 25(1):149.

PMID: 40055612 PMC: 11889859. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-025-03742-0.


Prognosis of extracolonic findings on clinical computed tomographic colonography: A single-center experience.

Tomimatsu H, Fujimoto K, Suto T, Matsuo M PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0315601.

PMID: 40019913 PMC: 11870342. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315601.


Effect of artificial intelligence-aided differentiation of adenomatous and non-adenomatous colorectal polyps at CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management.

Grosu S, Fabritius M, Winkelmann M, Puhr-Westerheide D, Ingenerf M, Maurus S Eur Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39862248 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11371-0.


Does Colonoscopy as a First Screening Test Still Make Sense?-Counterpoint.

Chuang M, Chiu H Dig Dis Sci. 2024; .

PMID: 39641898 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08695-0.


Screening and Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer: A Review of the Literature.

Maida M, Dahiya D, Shah Y, Tiwari A, Gopakumar H, Vohra I Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(15).

PMID: 39123473 PMC: 11312202. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152746.


References
1.
Ahn C . Statistical methods for the estimation of sensitivity and specificity of site-specific diagnostic tests. J Periodontal Res. 1997; 32(4):351-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1997.tb00544.x. View

2.
Cotton P, Durkalski V, Pineau B, Palesch Y, Mauldin P, Hoffman B . Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA. 2004; 291(14):1713-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1713. View

3.
van Rijn J, Reitsma J, Stoker J, Bossuyt P, van Deventer S, Dekker E . Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101(2):343-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x. View

4.
Johnson C, Harmsen W, Wilson L, MacCarty R, Welch T, Ilstrup D . Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2003; 125(2):311-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00894-1. View

5.
Johnson C, MacCarty R, Welch T, Wilson L, Harmsen W, Ilstrup D . Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2(4):314-21. DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00061-8. View