» Articles » PMID: 30204077

Observer Performance with Varying Radiation Dose and Reconstruction Methods for Detection of Hepatic Metastases

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Sep 12
PMID 30204077
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose To estimate the ability of lower dose levels and iterative reconstruction (IR) to display hepatic metastases that can be detected by radiologists. Materials and Methods Projection data from 83 contrast agent-enhanced CT examinations were collected. Metastases were defined by histopathologic analysis or progression and regression. Lower radiation dose configurations were reconstructed at five dose levels with filtered back projection (FBP) and IR (automatic exposure control settings: 80, 100, 120, 160, and 200 quality reference mAs [QRM]). Three abdominal radiologists circumscribed metastases, indicating confidence (confidence range, 0-100) and image quality. Noninferiority was assessed by using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis (noninferiority limit, -0.10) and reader agreement rules, which required identification of metastases identified at routine dose, and no nonlesion localizations in patients negative for metastases, in 71 or more patient CT examinations (of 83), for each configuration. Results There were 123 hepatic metastases (mean size, 1.4 cm; median volume CT dose index and size-specific dose estimate, 11.0 and 13.4 mGy, respectively). By using JAFROC figure of merit, 100 QRM FBP did not meet noninferiority criteria and had estimated performance difference from routine dose of -0.08 (95% confidence interval: -0.11, -0.04). Preset reader agreement rules were not met for 100 QRM IR or 80 QRM IR, but were met for doses 120 QRM or higher (ie, size-specific dose estimate ≥ 8.0 mGy). IR improved image quality (P < .05) but not reader performance. Other than 160 QRM IR, lower dose levels were associated with reduced confidence in metastasis detection (P < .001). Conclusion For detection of hepatic metastases by using contrast-enhanced CT, dose levels that corresponded to 120 quality reference mAs (size-specific dose estimate, 8.0 mGy) and higher performed similarly to 200 quality reference mAs with filtered back projection. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Citing Articles

A paradigm shift in oncology imaging: a prospective cross-sectional study to assess low-dose deep learning image reconstruction versus standard-dose iterative reconstruction for comprehensive lesion detection in dual-energy computed tomography.

Hou P, Liu N, Feng X, Chen Y, Wang H, Wang X Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(9):6449-6465.

PMID: 39281146 PMC: 11400683. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-197.


A Proposal for a Process from as Low as Reasonably Achievable to an Ultra-Low-Level Goal in Chest Computed Tomography.

Fitton I, Charpentier E, Arsovic E, Isaia J, Guillou M, Saltel-Fulero A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200739 PMC: 11354269. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164597.


Peripheral liver metastases are more frequently missed than central metastases in contrast-enhanced CT: insights from a 25-reader performance study.

Hsieh S, Holmes Iii D, Carter R, Tan N, Inoue A, Yalon M Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 50(2):668-676.

PMID: 39162799 PMC: 11794030. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04520-4.


Development and validation of a noise insertion algorithm for photon-counting-detector CT.

Winfree T, McCollough C, Yu L Med Phys. 2024; 51(9):5943-5953.

PMID: 38923526 PMC: 11489017. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17263.


Image quality evaluation in deep-learning-based CT noise reduction using virtual imaging trial methods: Contrast-dependent spatial resolution.

Zhou Z, Gong H, Hsieh S, McCollough C, Yu L Med Phys. 2024; 51(8):5399-5413.

PMID: 38555876 PMC: 11321944. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17029.


References
1.
Dobeli K, Lewis S, Meikle S, Thiele D, Brennan P . Noise-reducing algorithms do not necessarily provide superior dose optimisation for hepatic lesion detection with multidetector CT. Br J Radiol. 2013; 86(1023):20120500. PMC: 3608061. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20120500. View

2.
Fletcher J, Yu L, Li Z, Manduca A, Blezek D, Hough D . Observer Performance in the Detection and Classification of Malignant Hepatic Nodules and Masses with CT Image-Space Denoising and Iterative Reconstruction. Radiology. 2015; 276(2):465-78. PMC: 4514571. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015141991. View

3.
Martinsen A, Saether H, Kristian Hol P, Olsen D, Skaane P . Iterative reconstruction reduces abdominal CT dose. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 81(7):1483-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.021. View

4.
Solomon J, Marin D, Roy Choudhury K, Patel B, Samei E . Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative.... Radiology. 2017; 284(3):777-787. PMC: 5702911. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161736. View

5.
Goenka A, Herts B, Obuchowski N, Primak A, Dong F, Karim W . Effect of reduced radiation exposure and iterative reconstruction on detection of low-contrast low-attenuation lesions in an anthropomorphic liver phantom: an 18-reader study. Radiology. 2014; 272(1):154-63. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131928. View