» Articles » PMID: 18322462

Identifying Natural Images from Human Brain Activity

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2008 Mar 7
PMID 18322462
Citations 439
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A challenging goal in neuroscience is to be able to read out, or decode, mental content from brain activity. Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have decoded orientation, position and object category from activity in visual cortex. However, these studies typically used relatively simple stimuli (for example, gratings) or images drawn from fixed categories (for example, faces, houses), and decoding was based on previous measurements of brain activity evoked by those same stimuli or categories. To overcome these limitations, here we develop a decoding method based on quantitative receptive-field models that characterize the relationship between visual stimuli and fMRI activity in early visual areas. These models describe the tuning of individual voxels for space, orientation and spatial frequency, and are estimated directly from responses evoked by natural images. We show that these receptive-field models make it possible to identify, from a large set of completely novel natural images, which specific image was seen by an observer. Identification is not a mere consequence of the retinotopic organization of visual areas; simpler receptive-field models that describe only spatial tuning yield much poorer identification performance. Our results suggest that it may soon be possible to reconstruct a picture of a person's visual experience from measurements of brain activity alone.

Citing Articles

Decoding auditory working memory content from EEG aftereffects of auditory-cortical TMS.

Uluc I, Daneshzand M, Jas M, Kotlarz P, Lankinen K, Fiedler J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975364 PMC: 11838191. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.04.583379.


Compression-enabled interpretability of voxelwise encoding models.

Kamali F, Suratgar A, Menhaj M, Abbasi-Asl R PLoS Comput Biol. 2025; 21(2):e1012822.

PMID: 39970189 PMC: 11867343. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012822.


Improved image reconstruction from brain activity through automatic image captioning.

Kalantari F, Faez K, Amindavar H, Nazari S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4907.

PMID: 39930076 PMC: 11811215. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89242-3.


Ultra high density imaging arrays in diffuse optical tomography for human brain mapping improve image quality and decoding performance.

Markow Z, Trobaugh J, Richter E, Tripathy K, Rafferty S, Svoboda A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3175.

PMID: 39863633 PMC: 11762274. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85858-7.


Multisensory naturalistic decoding with high-density diffuse optical tomography.

Tripathy K, Markow Z, Fogarty M, Schroeder M, Svoboda A, Eggebrecht A Neurophotonics. 2025; 12(1):015002.

PMID: 39850351 PMC: 11755382. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.12.1.015002.


References
1.
Hansen K, David S, Gallant J . Parametric reverse correlation reveals spatial linearity of retinotopic human V1 BOLD response. Neuroimage. 2004; 23(1):233-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.012. View

2.
Heeger D, Ress D . What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity?. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002; 3(2):142-51. DOI: 10.1038/nrn730. View

3.
Haynes J, Rees G . Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8(5):686-91. DOI: 10.1038/nn1445. View

4.
Olman C, Ugurbil K, Schrater P, Kersten D . BOLD fMRI and psychophysical measurements of contrast response to broadband images. Vision Res. 2004; 44(7):669-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.10.022. View

5.
Smith A, Singh K, Williams A, Greenlee M . Estimating receptive field size from fMRI data in human striate and extrastriate visual cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2001; 11(12):1182-90. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/11.12.1182. View