» Articles » PMID: 18644471

Maintaining Replication Fork Integrity in UV-irradiated Escherichia Coli Cells

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2008 Jul 23
PMID 18644471
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In dividing cells, the stalling of replication fork complexes by impediments to DNA unwinding or by template imperfections that block synthesis by the polymerase subunits is a serious threat to genomic integrity and cell viability. What happens to stalled forks depends on the nature of the offending obstacle. In UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells DNA synthesis is delayed for a considerable period, during which forks undergo extensive processing before replication can resume. Thus, restart depends on factors needed to load the replicative helicase, indicating that the replisome may have dissociated. It also requires the RecFOR proteins, which are known to load RecA recombinase on single-stranded DNA, implying that template strands are exposed. To gain a further understanding of how UV irradiation affects replication and how replication resumes after a block, we used fluorescence microscopy and BrdU or radioisotope labelling to examine chromosome replication and cell cycle progression. Our studies confirm that RecFOR promote efficient reactivation of stalled forks and demonstrate that they are also needed for productive replication initiated at the origin, or triggered elsewhere by damage to the DNA. Although delayed, all modes of replication do recover in the absence of these proteins, but nascent DNA strands are degraded more extensively by RecJ exonuclease. However, these strands are also degraded in the presence of RecFOR when restart is blocked by other means, indicating that RecA loading is not sufficient to stabilise and protect the fork. This is consistent with the idea that RecA actively promotes restart. Thus, in contrast to eukaryotic cells, there may be no factor in bacterial cells acting specifically to stabilise stalled forks. Instead, nascent strands may be protected by the simple expedient of promoting restart. We also report that the efficiency of fork reactivation is not affected in polB mutants.

Citing Articles

Molecular insights into the prototypical single-stranded DNA-binding protein from .

Bonde N, Kozlov A, Cox M, Lohman T, Keck J Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2024; 59(1-2):99-127.

PMID: 38770626 PMC: 11209772. DOI: 10.1080/10409238.2024.2330372.


Chromosome Segregation and Cell Division Defects in Recombination Mutants Exposed to Different DNA-Damaging Treatments.

Zahradka K, Repar J, dermic D, Zahradka D Microorganisms. 2023; 11(3).

PMID: 36985274 PMC: 10051365. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11030701.


Recombination Mediator Proteins: Misnomers That Are Key to Understanding the Genomic Instabilities in Cancer.

Courcelle J, Worley T, Courcelle C Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(3).

PMID: 35327990 PMC: 8950967. DOI: 10.3390/genes13030437.


Participation of RecJ in the base excision repair pathway of Deinococcus radiodurans.

Cheng K, Xu Y, Chen X, Lu H, He Y, Wang L Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48(17):9859-9871.

PMID: 32870272 PMC: 7515722. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa714.


Processing closely spaced lesions during Nucleotide Excision Repair triggers mutagenesis in E. coli.

Janel-Bintz R, Napolitano R, Isogawa A, Fujii S, Fuchs R PLoS Genet. 2017; 13(7):e1006881.

PMID: 28686598 PMC: 5521853. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006881.