» Articles » PMID: 28978737

Earless Toads Sense Low Frequencies but Miss the High Notes

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Oct 6
PMID 28978737
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sensory losses or reductions are frequently attributed to relaxed selection. However, anuran species have lost tympanic middle ears many times, despite anurans' use of acoustic communication and the benefit of middle ears for hearing airborne sound. Here we determine whether pre-existing alternative sensory pathways enable anurans lacking tympanic middle ears (termed earless anurans) to hear airborne sound as well as eared species or to better sense vibrations in the environment. We used auditory brainstem recordings to compare hearing and vibrational sensitivity among 10 species (six eared, four earless) within the Neotropical true toad family (Bufonidae). We found that species lacking middle ears are less sensitive to high-frequency sounds, however, low-frequency hearing and vibrational sensitivity are equivalent between eared and earless species. Furthermore, extratympanic hearing sensitivity varies among earless species, highlighting potential species differences in extratympanic hearing mechanisms. We argue that ancestral bufonids may have sufficient extratympanic hearing and vibrational sensitivity such that earless lineages tolerated the loss of high frequency hearing sensitivity by adopting species-specific behavioural strategies to detect conspecifics, predators and prey.

Citing Articles

Convergent Anuran Middle Ear Loss Lacks a Universal, Adaptive Explanation.

Womack M, Hoke K Brain Behav Evol. 2023; 98(6):290-301.

PMID: 37913755 PMC: 10885836. DOI: 10.1159/000534936.


The continued importance of comparative auditory research to modern scientific discovery.

Capshaw G, Brown A, Pena J, Carr C, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Tollin D Hear Res. 2023; 433:108766.

PMID: 37084504 PMC: 10321136. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108766.


Ontogeny of the middle ear and auditory sensitivity in the Natterjack toad (Epidalea calamita).

Lauridsen T, Christensen-Dalsgaard J J Exp Biol. 2022; 225(21).

PMID: 36268787 PMC: 9687611. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.244759.


Hearing without a tympanic ear.

Capshaw G, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Carr C J Exp Biol. 2022; 225(12).

PMID: 35724322 PMC: 9250799. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.244130.


Size, microhabitat, and loss of larval feeding drive cranial diversification in frogs.

Bardua C, Fabre A, Clavel J, Bon M, Das K, Stanley E Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):2503.

PMID: 33947859 PMC: 8096824. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22792-y.


References
1.
Heffner R, Koay G, Heffner H . Audiograms of five species of rodents: implications for the evolution of hearing and the perception of pitch. Hear Res. 2001; 157(1-2):138-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(01)00298-2. View

2.
Mason M, Narins P . Vibrometric studies of the middle ear of the bullfrog Rana catesbeiana II. The operculum. J Exp Biol. 2002; 205(Pt 20):3167-76. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.20.3167. View

3.
WEVER E, Vernon J, Peterson E, Crowley D . AUDITORY RESPONSES IN THE TOKAY GECKO. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963; 50:806-11. PMC: 221930. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.50.5.806. View

4.
Hetherington T . The effects of body size on functional properties of middle ear systems of anuran amphibians. Brain Behav Evol. 1992; 39(3):133-42. DOI: 10.1159/000114111. View

5.
Jeffery W . Adaptive evolution of eye degeneration in the Mexican blind cavefish. J Hered. 2005; 96(3):185-96. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esi028. View