» Articles » PMID: 27766381

Comparative and Developmental Patterns of Amphibious Auditory Function in Salamanders

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Oct 22
PMID 27766381
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Early amphibious tetrapods may have detected aquatic sound pressure using sound-induced lung vibrations, but their lack of tympanic middle ears would have restricted aerial sensitivity. Sharing these characteristics, salamanders could be models for the carryover of auditory function across an aquatic-terrestrial boundary without tympanic middle ears. We measured amphibious auditory evoked potential audiograms in five phylogenetically and ecologically distinct salamanders (Amphiuma means, Notophthalmus viridescens, Ambystoma talpoideum, Eurycea spp., and Plethodon glutinosus) and tested whether metamorphosis and terrestrial niche were linked to aerial sensitivity. Threshold differences between media varied between species. A. means' relative aerial sensitivity was greatest at 100 Hz and decreased with increasing frequency. In contrast, all other salamanders retained greater sensitivity up to 500 Hz, and in A. talpoideum and Eurycea, relative sensitivity at 500 Hz was higher than at 100 Hz. Aerial thresholds of terrestrial P. glutinosus above 200 Hz were similar to A. talpoideum and Eurycea, but lower than N. viridescens and A. means. Metamorphosis did not affect aerial sensitivity in N. viridescens or A. talpoideum. These results fail to support a hypothesis of terrestrial hearing specialization across ontogeny or phylogeny. We discuss methodological limitations to our amphibious comparisons and factors affecting variation in amphibious performance.

Citing Articles

Hearing without a tympanic ear.

Capshaw G, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Carr C J Exp Biol. 2022; 225(12).

PMID: 35724322 PMC: 9250799. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.244130.


Underwater sound production varies within not between species in sympatric newts.

Hubacek J, Sugerkova M, Gvozdik L PeerJ. 2019; 7:e6649.

PMID: 30944780 PMC: 6441559. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6649.


Gene, cell, and organ multiplication drives inner ear evolution.

Fritzsch B, Elliott K Dev Biol. 2017; 431(1):3-15.

PMID: 28866362 PMC: 5643246. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.08.034.

References
1.
Ladich F, Fay R . Auditory evoked potential audiometry in fish. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2015; 23(3):317-364. PMC: 4560088. DOI: 10.1007/s11160-012-9297-z. View

2.
Hetherington T, Jaslow A, Lombard R . Comparative morphology of the amphibian opercularis system: I. General design features and functional interpretation. J Morphol. 1986; 190(1):43-61. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051900105. View

3.
Bech Christensen C, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Brandt C, Madsen P . Hearing with an atympanic ear: good vibration and poor sound-pressure detection in the royal python, Python regius. J Exp Biol. 2011; 215(Pt 2):331-42. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.062539. View

4.
Clack J . Patterns and processes in the early evolution of the tetrapod ear. J Neurobiol. 2002; 53(2):251-64. DOI: 10.1002/neu.10129. View

5.
Fritzsch B . The lateral-line and inner-ear afferents in larval and adult urodeles. Brain Behav Evol. 1988; 31(6):325-48. DOI: 10.1159/000116599. View