» Articles » PMID: 17684556

Biometric Evidence That Sexual Selection Has Shaped the Hominin Face

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2007 Aug 9
PMID 17684556
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We consider sex differences in human facial morphology in the context of developmental change. We show that at puberty, the height of the upper face, between the lip and the brow, develops differently in males and females, and that these differences are not explicable in terms of sex differences in body size. We find the same dimorphism in the faces of human ancestors. We propose that the relative shortening in men and lengthening in women of the anterior upper face at puberty is the mechanistic consequence of extreme maxillary rotation during ontogeny. A link between this developmental model and sexual dimorphism is made for the first time, and provides a new set of morphological criteria to sex human crania. This finding has important implications for the role of sexual selection in the evolution of anthropoid faces and for theories of human facial attractiveness.

Citing Articles

Violence exposure is associated with preference for masculine faces: evidence from Senegal.

Turecek P, cerny V, Diallo M, Cisse N, Pokorny S, Kleisner K Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2042):20243105.

PMID: 40068826 PMC: 11896705. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.3105.


Three-Dimensional Geometric Morphometric Characterization of Facial Sexual Dimorphism in Juveniles.

Solazzo R, Cappella A, Gibelli D, Dolci C, Tartaglia G, Sforza C Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941324 PMC: 11817074. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030395.


Comparative Context of Hard-Tissue Sexual Dimorphism in Early Hominins: Implications for Alpha Taxonomy.

Balolia K, Wood B Evol Anthropol. 2025; 34(1):e22052.

PMID: 39748147 PMC: 11695701. DOI: 10.1002/evan.22052.


Relative facial width, and its association with canine size and body mass among chimpanzees and bonobos: Implications for understanding facial width-to-height ratio expression among human populations.

Balolia K, Baughan K, Massey J Am J Biol Anthropol. 2024; 186(1):e25040.

PMID: 39529448 PMC: 11775434. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.25040.


Does the primate face cue personality?.

Wilson V, Masilkova M Personal Neurosci. 2023; 6:e7.

PMID: 38107779 PMC: 10725780. DOI: 10.1017/pen.2023.5.


References
1.
Shea B, Bailey R . Allometry and adaptation of body proportions and stature in African pygmies. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1996; 100(3):311-40. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199607)100:3<311::AID-AJPA2>3.0.CO;2-X. View

2.
Ferrario V, Sforza C, Poggio C, Schmitz J . Facial volume changes during normal human growth and development. Anat Rec. 1998; 250(4):480-7. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199804)250:4<480::AID-AR12>3.0.CO;2-K. View

3.
Throckmorton G, Ellis 3rd E, Buschang P . Morphologic and biomechanical correlates with maximum bite forces in orthognathic surgery patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 58(5):515-24. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(00)90014-4. View

4.
Bhat M, ENLOW D . Facial variations related to headform type. Angle Orthod. 1985; 55(4):269-80. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1985)055<0269:FVRTHT>2.0.CO;2. View

5.
Swaddle J, Reierson G . Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males. Proc Biol Sci. 2002; 269(1507):2285-9. PMC: 1691166. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2165. View