» Articles » PMID: 9915304

Sexual Dimorphism in the Face of Australopithecus Africanus

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1999 Jan 23
PMID 9915304
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently discovered crania of Australopithecus africanus from Sterkfontein Member 4 and Makapansgat enlarge the size range of the species and encourage a reappraisal of both the degree and pattern of sexual dimorphism. Resampling methodology (bootstrapping) is used here to establish that A. africanus has a greater craniofacial size range than chimpanzees or modern humans, a range which is best attributed to a moderately high degree of sexual dimorphism. Compared to other fossil hominins, this variation is similar to that of Homo habilis (sensu lato) but less than that of A. boisei. The finding of moderately high dimorphism is corroborated by a CV-based estimate and ratios between those specimens considered to be male and those considered to be female. Inferences about the pattern of craniofacial dimorphism in the A. africanus face currently rely on the relationship of morphology and size. Larger specimens, particularly Stw 505, show prominent superciliary eminences and glabellar regions, but in features related in part to canine size, such as the curvature of the infraorbital surface, large and small specimens of A. africanus are similar. In this respect, the pattern resembles that of modern humans more so than chimpanzees or lowland gorillas. A. africanus may also show novel patterns of sexual dimorphism when compared to extant hominines, such as in the form of the anterior pillar. However, males of the species do not exhibit characteristics of more derived hominins, such as A. robustus.

Citing Articles

Reappraising the palaeobiology of Australopithecus.

Alemseged Z Nature. 2023; 617(7959):45-54.

PMID: 37138108 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05957-1.


Towards the restoration of ancient hominid craniofacial anatomy: Chimpanzee morphology reveals covariation between craniometrics and facial soft tissue thickness.

Campbell R, Vinas G, Henneberg M PLoS One. 2021; 16(6):e0245760.

PMID: 34086683 PMC: 8177512. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245760.


Sexual dimorphism in Homo erectus inferred from 1.5 Ma footprints near Ileret, Kenya.

Villmoare B, Hatala K, Jungers W Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):7687.

PMID: 31118467 PMC: 6531427. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44060-2.


Assessing sources of error in comparative analyses of primate behavior: Intraspecific variation in group size and the social brain hypothesis.

Sandel A, Miller J, Mitani J, Nunn C, Patterson S, Garamszegi L J Hum Evol. 2016; 94:126-33.

PMID: 27178464 PMC: 5436711. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.03.007.


A cephalometric study of skulls from the Bahriyah oasis.

Zaki M, Soliman M, El-Bassyouni H J Forensic Dent Sci. 2013; 4(2):88-92.

PMID: 23741149 PMC: 3669484. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.109895.