» Articles » PMID: 35179485

A Meta-analysis of the Association Between Male Dimorphism and Fitness Outcomes in Humans

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Feb 18
PMID 35179485
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Humans are sexually dimorphic: men and women differ in body build and composition, craniofacial structure, and voice pitch, likely mediated in part by developmental testosterone. Sexual selection hypotheses posit that, ancestrally, more 'masculine' men may have acquired more mates and/or sired more viable offspring. Thus far, however, evidence for either association is unclear. Here, we meta-analyze the relationships between six masculine traits and mating/reproductive outcomes (96 studies, 474 effects, N = 177,044). Voice pitch, height, and testosterone all predicted mating; however, strength/muscularity was the strongest and only consistent predictor of both mating and reproduction. Facial masculinity and digit ratios did not significantly predict either. There was no clear evidence for any effects of masculinity on offspring viability. Our findings support arguments that strength/muscularity may be sexually selected in humans, but cast doubt regarding selection for other forms of masculinity and highlight the need to increase tests of evolutionary hypotheses outside of industrialized populations.

Citing Articles

Violence exposure is associated with preference for masculine faces: evidence from Senegal.

Turecek P, cerny V, Diallo M, Cisse N, Pokorny S, Kleisner K Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2042):20243105.

PMID: 40068826 PMC: 11896705. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.3105.


I tweet, therefore I am: a systematic review on social media use and disorders of the social brain.

Yang N, Crespi B BMC Psychiatry. 2025; 25(1):95.

PMID: 39901112 PMC: 11792667. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-06528-6.


Men display faster in male-biased mating contexts.

Davidson C, Buckley D, Benenson J Biol Lett. 2024; 20(12):20240487.

PMID: 39689853 PMC: 11651882. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0487.


Mate assessment based on physical characteristics: a review and reflection.

Watkins C Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(1):113-130.

PMID: 39175167 PMC: 11718632. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13131.


Genomic regions and biological pathways associated with sex-limited reproductive traits in bovine species.

Olasege B, Yin Oh Z, Tahir M, Porto-Neto L, Hayes B, Fortes M J Anim Sci. 2024; 102.

PMID: 38545844 PMC: 11135212. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae085.


References
1.
Marcinkowska U, Jasienska G, Prokop P . A Comparison of Masculinity Facial Preference Among Naturally Cycling, Pregnant, Lactating, and Post-Menopausal Women. Arch Sex Behav. 2017; 47(5):1367-1374. PMC: 5954065. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-017-1093-3. View

2.
Pollet T, van der Meij L, Cobey K, Buunk A . Testosterone levels and their associations with lifetime number of opposite sex partners and remarriage in a large sample of American elderly men and women. Horm Behav. 2011; 60(1):72-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.03.005. View

3.
Chagnon N . Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science. 1988; 239(4843):985-92. DOI: 10.1126/science.239.4843.985. View

4.
Kirchengast S . Differential reproductive success and body size in !Kung San people from northern Namibia. Coll Antropol. 2000; 24(1):121-32. View

5.
Manning J, Henzi P, Venkatramana P, Martin S, Singh D . Second to fourth digit ratio: ethnic differences and family size in English, Indian and South African populations. Ann Hum Biol. 2003; 30(5):579-88. DOI: 10.1080/0301446032000112689. View