» Articles » PMID: 37428141

Attractiveness Differentially Affects Direct Versus Indirect Face Evaluations in Two Cultures

Overview
Journal Evol Psychol
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2023 Jul 10
PMID 37428141
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although decades of research have identified facial features relating to people's evaluations of faces, specific features have largely been examined in isolation from each other. Recent work shows that considering the relative importance of these features in face evaluations is important to test theoretical assumptions of impression formation. Here, we examined how two facial features of evolutionary interest, facial attractiveness and facial-width-to-height ratio (FWHR), relate to evaluations of faces across two cultures. Because face evaluations are typically directly measured via self-reports, we also examined whether these features exert differential effects on both direct and indirect face evaluations. Evaluations of standardized photos naturally varying in facial attractiveness and FWHR were collected using the Affect Misattribution Procedure in the United States and Turkey. When their relative contributions were considered in the same model, facial attractiveness, but not FWHR, related to face evaluations across cultures. This positive attractiveness effect was stronger for direct versus indirect evaluations across cultures. These findings highlight the importance of considering the relative contributions of facial features to evaluations across cultures and suggest a culturally invariant role of attractiveness when intentionally evaluating faces.

References
1.
Scheib J, Gangestad S, Thornhill R . Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc Biol Sci. 1999; 266(1431):1913-7. PMC: 1690211. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0866. View

2.
Deska J, Lloyd E, Hugenberg K . Facing humanness: Facial width-to-height ratio predicts ascriptions of humanity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017; 114(1):75-94. DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000110. View

3.
Montagne B, Kessels R, Frigerio E, de Haan E, Perrett D . Sex differences in the perception of affective facial expressions: do men really lack emotional sensitivity?. Cogn Process. 2008; 6(2):136-41. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-005-0050-6. View

4.
Thornhill , Gangestad . Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999; 3(12):452-460. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01403-5. View

5.
Kosinski M . Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Does Not Predict Self-Reported Behavioral Tendencies. Psychol Sci. 2017; 28(11):1675-1682. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617716929. View