» Articles » PMID: 16812328

Delay and Amount of Reward in a Concurrent Chain

Overview
Date 1983 May 1
PMID 16812328
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eight pigeons responded under a concurrent-chain schedule for rewards differing in both delay and amount, the larger reward being associated with the longer delay. Preference was examined as the absolute durations of the terminal-link delays were increased at four different delay ratios. Difficulties with other experiments of this type were controlled for by the use of (a) a single-tape initial link to equalize terminal-link entries, (b) a blackout following the more immediate reward to equalize terminal-link length, and (c) a photocell to measure reinforcer duration more accurately. Preference for the larger reward changed systematically as delays increased in all conditions, decreasing for the 6:1, 3:1, and 3:2 ratios, and increasing for the 1:1 ratio. These results were similar to, but significantly different from, those of previous investigations. The implications of these results for various models of concurrent-chain behavior are discussed.

Citing Articles

Time discounting and time preference in animals: A critical review.

Hayden B Psychon Bull Rev. 2015; 23(1):39-53.

PMID: 26063653 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0879-3.


Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.

DeLeon I, Chase J, Frank-Crawford M, Carreau-Webster A, Triggs M, Bullock C J Appl Behav Anal. 2014; 47(2):293-313.

PMID: 24782203 PMC: 4491431. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.116.


Postreward delays and systematic biases in measures of animal temporal discounting.

Blanchard T, Pearson J, Hayden B Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(38):15491-6.

PMID: 24003113 PMC: 3780845. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310446110.


Pigeons' choices with token stimuli in concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Mazur J, Biondi D J Exp Anal Behav. 2013; 99(2):159-78.

PMID: 23460072 PMC: 3896056. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.12.


Risky choice in pigeons: preference for amount variability using a token-reinforcement system.

Lagorio C, Hackenberg T J Exp Anal Behav. 2012; 98(2):139-54.

PMID: 23008519 PMC: 3449852. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-139.


References
1.
Mazur J, Logue A . Choice in a "self-control" paradigm: effects of a fading procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978; 30(1):11-7. PMC: 1332727. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-11. View

2.
Stubbs D, Pliskoff S . Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969; 12(6):887-95. PMC: 1338698. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-887. View

3.
Fantino E . Choice and rate of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969; 12(5):723-30. PMC: 1338674. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-723. View

4.
Ainslie G . Impulse control in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974; 21(3):485-9. PMC: 1333221. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-485. View

5.
Ito M, Asaki K . Choice behavior of rats in a concurrent-chains schedule: Amount and delay of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982; 37(3):383-92. PMC: 1333154. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-383. View