» Articles » PMID: 16811561

Commitment, Choice and Self-control

Overview
Date 1972 Jan 1
PMID 16811561
Citations 326
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When offered a choice (Choice Y) between a small immediate reward (2-sec exposure to grain) and a large reward (4-sec exposure to grain) delayed by 4 sec, pigeons invariably preferred the small, immediate reward. However, when offered a choice (Choice X) between a delay of T seconds followed by Choice Y and a delay of T seconds followed by restriction to the large delayed reward only, the pigeon's choice depended on T. When T was small, the pigeons chose the alternative leading to Choice Y (and then chose the small, immediate reward). When T was large, the pigeons chose the alternative leading to the large delayed reward only. The reversal of preference as T increases is predicted by several recent models for choice between various amounts and delays of reward. The preference for the large delayed alternative with long durations of T parallels everyday instances of advance commitment to a given course of action. Such commitment may be seen as a prototype for self-control.

Citing Articles

Self-reported history of head injury is associated with cognitive impulsivity on a delay discounting task.

Allen M, Interian A, Reddy V, Rodriguez K, Myers C PeerJ. 2025; 13:e19057.

PMID: 40065912 PMC: 11892457. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.19057.


The amygdala and the pursuit of future rewards.

Johnson S, Grabenhorst F Front Neurosci. 2025; 18:1517231.

PMID: 39911407 PMC: 11794525. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1517231.


Measuring self-control in a wild songbird using a spatial discounting task.

McCallum E, Shaw R Anim Cogn. 2024; 27(1):70.

PMID: 39455452 PMC: 11511709. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01911-4.


Dynamic inconsistency in great apes.

Salas-Morellon L, Palacios-Huerta I, Call J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):18130.

PMID: 39103396 PMC: 11300655. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67771-7.


Human laboratory models of reward in substance use disorder.

Johansen A, Acuff S, Strickland J Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2024; 241():173803.

PMID: 38843997 PMC: 11223959. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173803.


References
1.
RENNER K . Temporal integration: an incentive approach to conflict resolution. Prog Exp Pers Res. 1967; 4:127-77. View

2.
Mischel W . Theory and research on the antecedents of self-imposed delay of reward. Prog Exp Pers Res. 1966; 3:85-132. View

3.
Chung S . Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965; 8(6):439-44. PMC: 1338130. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-439. View

4.
Catania A . Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963; 6:253-63. PMC: 1404302. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-253. View

5.
Fantino E . Choice and rate of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969; 12(5):723-30. PMC: 1338674. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-723. View