» Articles » PMID: 16771507

Aptamers Selected for Higher-affinity Binding Are Not More Specific for the Target Ligand

Overview
Journal J Am Chem Soc
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2006 Jun 15
PMID 16771507
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous study of eleven different in vitro-selected RNA aptamers that bind guanosine triphosphate (GTP) with K(d)s ranging from 8 microM to 9 nM showed that more information is required to specify the structures of the higher-affinity aptamers. We are interested in understanding how the more complex aptamers achieve higher affinities for the ligand. In vitro selection produces structural solutions to a functional problem that are are as simple as possible in terms of the information content needed to define them. It has long been assumed that the simplest way to improve the affinity of an aptamer is to increase the shape and functional group complementarity of the RNA binding pocket for the ligand. This argument underlies the hypothesis that selection for higher-affinity aptamers automatically leads to structures that bind more specifically to the target molecule. Here, we examined the binding specificities of the eleven GTP aptamers by carrying out competition binding studies with sixteen different chemical analogues of GTP. The aptamers have distinct patterns of specificity, implying that each RNA is a structurally unique solution to the problem of GTP binding. However, these experiments failed to provide evidence that higher-affinity aptamers bind more specifically to GTP. We suggest that the simplest way to improve aptamer K(d)s may be to increase the stability of the RNA tertiary structure with additional intramolecular RNA-RNA interactions; increasingly specific ligand binding may emerge only in response to direct selection for specificity.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic Applications of Aptamers.

Santarpia G, Carnes E Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(12).

PMID: 38928448 PMC: 11204156. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25126742.


A Prebiotic Genetic Nucleotide as an Early Darwinian Ancestor for Pre-RNA Evolution.

Sawant A, Tripathi S, Galande S, Rajamani S ACS Omega. 2024; 9(16):18072-18082.

PMID: 38680342 PMC: 11044211. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c09949.


Exploring the Landscape of Aptamers: From Cross-Reactive to Selective to Specific, High-Affinity Receptors for Cocaine.

Yang K, Alkhamis O, Canoura J, Bryant A, Gong E, Barbu M JACS Au. 2024; 4(2):760-770.

PMID: 38425914 PMC: 10900216. DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00781.


The assessment of molecular dynamics results of three-dimensional RNA aptamer structure prediction.

Ropii B, Bethasari M, Anshori I, Koesoema A, Shalannanda W, Satriawan A PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0288684.

PMID: 37498889 PMC: 10373999. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288684.


Native Top-Down Mass Spectrometry Uncovers Two Distinct Binding Motifs of a Functional Neomycin-Sensing Riboswitch Aptamer.

Heel S, Bartosik K, Juen F, Kreutz C, Micura R, Breuker K J Am Chem Soc. 2023; 145(28):15284-15294.

PMID: 37420313 PMC: 10360057. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c02774.


References
1.
Koizumi M, Breaker R . Molecular recognition of cAMP by an RNA aptamer. Biochemistry. 2000; 39(30):8983-92. DOI: 10.1021/bi000149n. View

2.
Lorsch J, Szostak J . Chance and necessity in the selection of nucleic acid catalysts. Acc Chem Res. 1996; 29(2):103-10. DOI: 10.1021/ar9501378. View

3.
Lancet D, Sadovsky E, Seidemann E . Probability model for molecular recognition in biological receptor repertoires: significance to the olfactory system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90(8):3715-9. PMC: 46372. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3715. View

4.
Sussman D, Nix J, Wilson C . The structural basis for molecular recognition by the vitamin B 12 RNA aptamer. Nat Struct Biol. 2000; 7(1):53-7. DOI: 10.1038/71253. View

5.
Hertel K, Peracchi A, Uhlenbeck O, Herschlag D . Use of intrinsic binding energy for catalysis by an RNA enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(16):8497-502. PMC: 22973. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8497. View