» Articles » PMID: 16510427

Solution Structure of an Informationally Complex High-affinity RNA Aptamer to GTP

Overview
Journal RNA
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2006 Mar 3
PMID 16510427
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Higher-affinity RNA aptamers to GTP are more informationally complex than lower-affinity aptamers. Analog binding studies have shown that the additional information needed to improve affinity does not specify more interactions with the ligand. In light of those observations, we would like to understand the structural characteristics that enable complex aptamers to bind their ligands with higher affinity. Here we present the solution structure of the 41-nt Class I GTP aptamer (K(d) = 75 nM) as determined by NMR. The backbone of the aptamer forms a reverse-S that shapes the binding pocket. The ligand nucleobase stacks between purine platforms and makes hydrogen bonds with the edge of another base. Interestingly, the local modes of interaction for the Class I aptamer and an RNA aptamer that binds ATP with a K(d) of 6 microM are very much alike. The aptamers exhibit nearly identical levels of binding specificity and fraction of ligand sequestered from the solvent (81%-85%). However, the GTP aptamer is more informationally complex (approximately 45 vs. 35 bits) and has a larger recognition bulge (15 vs. 12 nucleotides) with many more stabilizing base-base interactions. Because the aptamers have similar modes of ligand binding, we conclude that the stabilizing structural elements in the Class I aptamer are responsible for much of the difference in K(d). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that increasing the number of intra-RNA interactions, rather than adding specific contacts to the ligand, is the simplest way to improve binding affinity.

Citing Articles

RNA-ligand molecular docking: advances and challenges.

Zhou Y, Jiang Y, Chen S Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 37293430 PMC: 10250017. DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1571.


RNA origami scaffolds facilitate cryo-EM characterization of a Broccoli-Pepper aptamer FRET pair.

Vallina N, McRae E, Hansen B, Boussebayle A, Andersen E Nucleic Acids Res. 2023; 51(9):4613-4624.

PMID: 36999628 PMC: 10201433. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad224.


Biofunctionalization of Multiplexed Silicon Photonic Biosensors.

Puumala L, Grist S, Morales J, Bickford J, Chrostowski L, Shekhar S Biosensors (Basel). 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36671887 PMC: 9855810. DOI: 10.3390/bios13010053.


Aptamer Technology and Its Applications in Bone Diseases.

Liu X, Hu J, Ning Y, Xu H, Cai H, Yang A Cell Transplant. 2023; 32:9636897221144949.

PMID: 36591965 PMC: 9811309. DOI: 10.1177/09636897221144949.


Heuristic algorithms in evolutionary computation and modular organization of biological macromolecules: Applications to in vitro evolution.

Spirov A, Myasnikova E PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0260497.

PMID: 35085255 PMC: 8794168. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260497.


References
1.
Hermann T, Patel D . Adaptive recognition by nucleic acid aptamers. Science. 2000; 287(5454):820-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5454.820. View

2.
Schultes E, Spasic A, Mohanty U, Bartel D . Compact and ordered collapse of randomly generated RNA sequences. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005; 12(12):1130-6. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb1014. View

3.
Gebhardt K, Shokraei A, Babaie E, Lindqvist B . RNA aptamers to S-adenosylhomocysteine: kinetic properties, divalent cation dependency, and comparison with anti-S-adenosylhomocysteine antibody. Biochemistry. 2000; 39(24):7255-65. DOI: 10.1021/bi000295t. View

4.
Moore P . Structural motifs in RNA. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000; 68:287-300. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.287. View

5.
Chen X, McDowell J, Kierzek R, Krugh T, Turner D . Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and molecular modeling reveal that different hydrogen bonding patterns are possible for G.U pairs: one hydrogen bond for each G.U pair in r(GGCGUGCC)(2) and two for each G.U pair in r(GAGUGCUC)(2). Biochemistry. 2000; 39(30):8970-82. View