» Articles » PMID: 15932942

Variation in Efficiency of DNA Mismatch Repair at Different Sites in the Yeast Genome

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2005 Jun 4
PMID 15932942
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evolutionary studies have suggested that mutation rates vary significantly at different positions in the eukaryotic genome. The mechanism that is responsible for this context-dependence of mutation rates is not understood. We demonstrate experimentally that frameshift mutation rates in yeast microsatellites depend on the genomic context and that this variation primarily reflects the context-dependence of the efficiency of DNA mismatch repair. We measured the stability of a 16.5-repeat polyGT tract by using a reporter gene (URA3-GT) in which the microsatellite was inserted in-frame into the yeast URA3 gene. We constructed 10 isogenic yeast strains with the reporter gene at different locations in the genome. Rates of frameshift mutations that abolished the correct reading frame of this gene were determined by fluctuation analysis. A 16-fold difference was found among these strains. We made mismatch-repair-deficient (msh2) derivatives of six of the strains. Mutation rates were elevated for all of these strains, but the differences in rates among the strains were substantially reduced. The simplest interpretation of this result is that the efficiency of DNA mismatch repair varies in different regions of the genome, perhaps reflecting some aspect of chromosome structure.

Citing Articles

The dynamics of loss of heterozygosity events in genomes.

Dutta A, Schacherer J EMBO Rep. 2025; 26(3):602-612.

PMID: 39747660 PMC: 11811284. DOI: 10.1038/s44319-024-00353-w.


Mlh1 heterozygosity and promoter methylation associates with microsatellite instability in mouse sperm.

Shrestha K, Tuominen M, Kauppi L Mutagenesis. 2021; 36(3):237-244.

PMID: 33740045 PMC: 8262379. DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geab010.


Advances in understanding the evolution of fungal genome architecture.

Priest S, Yadav V, Heitman J F1000Res. 2020; 9.

PMID: 32765832 PMC: 7385547. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.25424.1.


Effects of Mutations on Microsatellite Stability and Homeologous Recombination in Rice.

Jiang M, Wu X, Song Y, Shen H, Cui H Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11:220.

PMID: 32194600 PMC: 7062918. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00220.


Cooperation between non-essential DNA polymerases contributes to genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Meyer D, Fu B, Chavez M, Loeillet S, Cerqueira P, Nicolas A DNA Repair (Amst). 2019; 76:40-49.

PMID: 30818168 PMC: 6443415. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.02.004.


References
1.
Reenan R, Kolodner R . Characterization of insertion mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH1 and MSH2 genes: evidence for separate mitochondrial and nuclear functions. Genetics. 1992; 132(4):975-85. PMC: 1205253. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.975. View

2.
Streisinger G, Okada Y, Emrich J, Newton J, Tsugita A, Terzaghi E . Frameshift mutations and the genetic code. This paper is dedicated to Professor Theodosius Dobzhansky on the occasion of his 66th birthday. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1966; 31:77-84. DOI: 10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.014. View

3.
Tautz D, Renz M . Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984; 12(10):4127-38. PMC: 318821. DOI: 10.1093/nar/12.10.4127. View

4.
Sharp P, Li W . The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4(3):222-30. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040443. View

5.
Wolfe K, Sharp P, Li W . Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome. Nature. 1989; 337(6204):283-5. DOI: 10.1038/337283a0. View