» Articles » PMID: 15255094

Do Sexual Ornaments Demonstrate Heightened Condition-dependent Expression As Predicted by the Handicap Hypothesis?

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2004 Jul 17
PMID 15255094
Citations 124
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The handicap hypothesis of sexual selection predicts that sexual ornaments have evolved heightened condition-dependent expression. The prediction has only recently been subject to experimental investigation. Many of the experiments are of limited value as they: (i) fail to compare condition dependence in sexual ornaments with suitable non-sexual trait controls; (ii) do not adequately account for body size variation; and (iii) typically consider no stress and extreme stress manipulations rather than a range of stresses similar to those experienced in nature. There is also a dearth of experimental studies investigating the genetic basis of condition dependence. Despite the common claim that sexual ornaments are condition-dependent, the unexpected conclusion from our literature review is that there is little support from well-designed experiments.

Citing Articles

Natural and sexual selection and functional roles influence colouration but not the amount of variation in butterfly wing colour patterns.

Dharmaraaj B, Kunte K BMC Ecol Evol. 2025; 25(1):11.

PMID: 39825244 PMC: 11740640. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-024-02346-8.


Does greater variation reside in the larger sex?.

Halsey L, Giofre D, Geary D Biol Lett. 2024; 20(11):20240404.

PMID: 39592002 PMC: 11597398. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0404.


Intraspecific body size variation across distributional moments reveals trait filtering processes.

Fitzgerald J, Ogilvie J, CaraDonna P J Anim Ecol. 2024; 94(3):394-409.

PMID: 39354661 PMC: 11880653. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.14186.


The role of condition on sexual selection in the seed bug .

Balfour V, Corliss M, Shuker D Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(9):e70226.

PMID: 39238569 PMC: 11374529. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70226.


The condition-dependence of male genital size and shape.

Pennell T, Sharma M, Sutter A, Wilson D, House C, Hosken D Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(3):e11180.

PMID: 38495435 PMC: 10944674. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11180.


References
1.
Grafen A . Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J Theor Biol. 1990; 144(4):473-516. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80087-6. View

2.
Houde A, Endler J . Correlated Evolution of Female Mating Preferences and Male Color Patterns in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science. 1990; 248(4961):1405-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.248.4961.1405. View

3.
Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A . Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution. J Theor Biol. 1999; 200(1):97-109. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0979. View

4.
David P, Bjorksten T, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A . Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature. 2000; 406(6792):186-8. DOI: 10.1038/35018079. View

5.
Scheuber H, Jacot A, Brinkhof M . The effect of past condition on a multicomponent sexual signal. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1526):1779-84. PMC: 1691443. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2449. View