» Articles » PMID: 34787569

Stronger Net Selection on Males Across Animals

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Nov 17
PMID 34787569
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sexual selection is considered the major driver for the evolution of sex differences. However, the eco-evolutionary dynamics of sexual selection and their role for a population's adaptive potential to respond to environmental change have only recently been explored. Theory predicts that sexual selection promotes adaptation at a low demographic cost only if sexual selection is aligned with natural selection and if net selection is stronger on males compared to females. We used a comparative approach to show that net selection is indeed stronger in males and provide preliminary support that this sex bias is associated with sexual selection. Given that both sexes share the vast majority of their genes, our findings corroborate the notion that the genome is often confronted with a more stressful environment when expressed in males. Collectively, our study supports one of the long-standing key assumptions required for sexual selection to bolster adaptation, and sexual selection may therefore enable some species to track environmental change more efficiently.

Citing Articles

Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in tetrapods is driven by varying patterns of sex-specific selection on size.

Slavenko A, Cooper N, Meiri S, Murali G, Pincheira-Donoso D, Thomas G Nat Ecol Evol. 2024; 9(3):464-473.

PMID: 39715950 PMC: 11893467. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02600-8.


The role of condition on sexual selection in the seed bug .

Balfour V, Corliss M, Shuker D Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(9):e70226.

PMID: 39238569 PMC: 11374529. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70226.


On the resolution of sexual conflict over shared traits.

Pennell T, Mank J, Alonzo S, Hosken D Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2027):20240438.

PMID: 39082243 PMC: 11289733. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0438.


Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Pattern of Evolution of Male and Female Reproductive Proteins in Seed Beetles.

Papachristos K, Sayadi A, Arnqvist G Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(7).

PMID: 38941482 PMC: 11251426. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae143.


Male harm suppresses female fitness, affecting the dynamics of adaptation and evolutionary rescue.

Gomez-Llano M, Faria G, Garcia-Roa R, Noble D, Carazo P Evol Lett. 2024; 8(1):149-160.

PMID: 38370549 PMC: 10871930. DOI: 10.1093/evlett/qrac002.


References
1.
Lukas D, Clutton-Brock T . The evolution of social monogamy in mammals. Science. 2013; 341(6145):526-30. DOI: 10.1126/science.1238677. View

2.
Cally J, Stuart-Fox D, Holman L . Meta-analytic evidence that sexual selection improves population fitness. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):2017. PMC: 6494874. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10074-7. View

3.
Candolin U, Heuschele J . Is sexual selection beneficial during adaptation to environmental change?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008; 23(8):446-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.04.008. View

4.
Connallon T, Matthews G . Cross-sex genetic correlations for fitness and fitness components: Connecting theoretical predictions to empirical patterns. Evol Lett. 2019; 3(3):254-262. PMC: 6546386. DOI: 10.1002/evl3.116. View

5.
Jones A . On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection. Evolution. 2009; 63(7):1673-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00664.x. View