» Articles » PMID: 39238569

The Role of Condition on Sexual Selection in the Seed Bug

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2024 Sep 6
PMID 39238569
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Organism condition plays an important role in sexual selection. Sexual ornaments and displays can be condition-dependent, reflecting either underlying genetic quality, experience of environmental stressors, or both. As such, the phenotypic expression of such traits, and the resulting patterns of mate choice acting on them, may be shaped by intrinsic genetic quality and the environment. Moreover, condition may also influence the choosing individual in mate choice, influencing their ability to invest in mate discrimination, or changing what traits of the chosen, including resources, are most preferred. Here we consider sexual selection and condition in the seed bug , a species characterised by strong post-copulatory sexual selection, but rather limited pre-copulatory discrimination. We manipulated short-term condition in both males and females by restricting access to water for 24 h. Water is particularly important in these bugs, given their feeding ecology and physiology. We found that water-deprived males proved less likely to mate, while copulation duration with water-deprived females was significantly reduced. Given the importance of copulation duration for the successful transfer of sperm by males to females, the data suggest cryptic male choice acting against water-deprived females. These data add to those suggesting that cryptic male choice for fecund females plays an important role in sexual selection in this species. More generally, our results support the widespread importance of condition in terms of mating dynamics and sexual selection.

Citing Articles

Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection in an Insect With High Levels of Mating Failure.

Balfour V, Armand M, Shuker D Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(10):e70407.

PMID: 39421326 PMC: 11483530. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70407.


Is mating failure caused by cryptic male choice in the seed bug ?.

Balfour V, Armand M, Shuker D Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(9):e70341.

PMID: 39296735 PMC: 11410458. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70341.

References
1.
van Heerwaarden B, Sgro C . Male fertility thermal limits predict vulnerability to climate warming. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):2214. PMC: 8044094. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22546-w. View

2.
Cotton S, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A . Condition dependence of sexual ornament size and variation in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Evolution. 2004; 58(5):1038-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00437.x. View

3.
Achorn A, Rosenthal G . It's Not about Him: Mismeasuring 'Good Genes' in Sexual Selection. Trends Ecol Evol. 2019; 35(3):206-219. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.11.007. View

4.
Dougherty L . Meta-analysis reveals that animal sexual signalling behaviour is honest and resource based. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021; 5(5):688-699. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-021-01409-z. View

5.
Balfour V, Black D, Shuker D . A single pleiotropic locus influences the rate of hybridization between two sibling species of bugs. Ecol Evol. 2020; 10(21):12224-12232. PMC: 7663077. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6853. View