Nutritional Effects on Male Calling Behaviour in the Variable Field Cricket
Overview
Affiliations
In the variable field cricket, Gryllus lineaticeps, females prefer higher chirp rates and longer chirp durations in male calling song. Higher chirp rates are energetically more expensive to produce, but the energetic cost of calling does not vary with chirp duration. We tested the hypothesis that nutrition affects male chirp rate and chirp duration. Full-sibling brothers of similar age were placed on high- and low-nutrition feeding regimes. There was no effect of feeding regime on male weight; neither group showed a significant change in weight, and the two groups did not differ from each other in weight change. However, males on the high-nutrition feeding regime both called more frequently and called at higher chirp rates when they did call. The two groups did not differ in chirp duration, the duration of pulses within chirps or chirp dominant frequency. These results suggest that females select mates based on one nutrition-dependent call character (chirp rate) and one nutrition-independent call character (chirp duration). In addition, because males in the two groups did not show significant differences in weight change, and because males on the high-nutrition feeding regime engaged in energetically more expensive calling, these results suggest that males invest any excess energy above their basic maintenance requirements in the production of call types that increase their attractiveness to females. The absence of a relationship between body condition and calling song structure for males in the field may be a consequence of this pattern of energy allocation. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
Delineating the calling pattern of from native and non-native plant species.
Sunny A, Singh P, Diwakar S, Sharma G PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16153.
PMID: 37868067 PMC: 10590098. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16153.
A comprehensive overview of the effects of urbanisation on sexual selection and sexual traits.
Cronin A, Smit J, Munoz M, Poirier A, Moran P, Jerem P Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022; 97(4):1325-1345.
PMID: 35262266 PMC: 9541148. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12845.
Meta-analysis reveals that animal sexual signalling behaviour is honest and resource based.
Dougherty L Nat Ecol Evol. 2021; 5(5):688-699.
PMID: 33723423 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-021-01409-z.
A dynamic threshold model for terminal investment.
Duffield K, Bowers E, Sakaluk S, Sadd B Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2018; 71(12).
PMID: 30002566 PMC: 6039117. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-017-2416-z.
Erregger B, Kovac H, Stabentheiner A, Hartbauer M, Romer H, Schmidt A J Exp Biol. 2017; 220(Pt 14):2635-2644.
PMID: 28495874 PMC: 5873499. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.155846.