» Articles » PMID: 12609891

Development of Unified Statistical Potentials Describing Protein-protein Interactions

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2003 Mar 1
PMID 12609891
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A residue-based and a heavy atom-based statistical pair potential are developed for use in assessing the strength of protein-protein interactions. To ensure the quality of the potentials, a nonredundant, high-quality dimer database is constructed. The protein complexes in this dataset are checked by a literature search to confirm that they form multimers, and the pairwise amino acid preference to interact across a protein-protein interface is analyzed and pair potentials constructed. The performance of the residue-based potentials is evaluated by using four jackknife tests and by assessing the potentials' ability to select true protein-protein interfaces from false ones. Compared to potentials developed for monomeric protein structure prediction, the interdomain potential performs much better at distinguishing protein-protein interactions. The potential developed from homodimer interfaces is almost the same as that developed from heterodimer interfaces with a correlation coefficient of 0.92. The residue-based potential is well suited for genomic scale protein interaction prediction and analysis, such as in a recently developed threading-based algorithm, MULTIPROSPECTOR. However, the more time-consuming atom-based potential performs better in identifying near-native structures from docking generated decoys.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Protein-Protein Docking Models Using Deep Learning.

Zhang Y, Wang X, Zhang Z, Huang Y, Kihara D Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2780:149-162.

PMID: 38987469 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3985-6_10.


Database-Driven Identification of Structurally Similar Protein-Protein Interfaces.

Graef J, Ehrt C, Reim T, Rarey M J Chem Inf Model. 2024; 64(8):3332-3349.

PMID: 38470439 PMC: 11040719. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01462.


Combining pairwise structural similarity and deep learning interface contact prediction to estimate protein complex model accuracy in CASP15.

Roy R, Liu J, Giri N, Guo Z, Cheng J Proteins. 2023; 91(12):1889-1902.

PMID: 37357816 PMC: 10749984. DOI: 10.1002/prot.26542.


Combining pairwise structural similarity and deep learning interface contact prediction to estimate protein complex model accuracy in CASP15.

Roy R, Liu J, Giri N, Guo Z, Cheng J bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 36945536 PMC: 10028888. DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.08.531814.


A random forest classifier for protein-protein docking models.

Barradas-Bautista D, Cao Z, Vangone A, Oliva R, Cavallo L Bioinform Adv. 2023; 2(1):vbab042.

PMID: 36699405 PMC: 9710594. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbab042.


References
1.
Berman H, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat T, Weissig H . The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 28(1):235-42. PMC: 102472. DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235. View

2.
Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz A . Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity. Proteins. 2000; 38(1):3-16. View

3.
Sheinerman F, Norel R, Honig B . Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2000; 10(2):153-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-440x(00)00065-8. View

4.
Hu Z, Ma B, WOLFSON H, Nussinov R . Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces. Proteins. 2000; 39(4):331-42. View

5.
Ponstingl H, Henrick K, Thornton J . Discriminating between homodimeric and monomeric proteins in the crystalline state. Proteins. 2000; 41(1):47-57. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0134(20001001)41:1<47::aid-prot80>3.3.co;2-#. View